Secure-Software-Design Sample Questions Answers

The category of secure software best practices being described is Training. This is because the focus is on educating new developers about organizational security policies and coding practices to mitigate potential threats. Training is a proactive approach to ensure that developers are aware of security concerns and are equipped with the knowledge to address them in their coding practices.

Data integrity requirements within a privacy impact statement ensure that personal information is maintained in an accurate and up-to-date manner. This involves establishing processes to regularly review and update personal data, as well as correct any inaccuracies. These requirements are crucial for maintaining the trustworthiness of the data and ensuring that decisions made based on this information are sound and reliable.

To combat identity spoofing threats, a mitigation technique that is often used is requiring user authorization. This involves implementing strong authentication methods to verify the identity of users before granting access to sensitive information or systems. Techniques such as two-factor authentication (2FA) or multi-factor authentication (MFA) are effective in reducing the risk of unauthorized access, as they require users to provide multiple pieces of evidence to confirm their identity, making it much harder for attackers to spoof an identity successfully.

The Asset-centric approach to threat modeling focuses on identifying and protecting the assets that are most valuable to an organization. This method prioritizes the assets themselves, assessing their sensitivity, value, and the impact on the business should they be compromised. It is a strategic approach that aims to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the organization’s key assets.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The team is in the Assess phase of penetration testing. This phase involves actively testing the software, identifying vulnerabilities, and documenting findings with recommendations. Receiving a report detailing a discovered flaw confirms that testing has been conducted and results are being evaluated. The Identify (A) phase involves defining scope and targets, Evaluate and Plan (B) covers planning test activities, and Deploy (C) refers to executing the test environment setup. The OWASP Penetration Testing Guide and NIST SP 800-115 clarify that assessment includes vulnerability discovery and documentation.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Preventing the disclosure of sensitive information in application responses is primarily addressed by implementing proper Error Handling and Logging practices.

When errors occur, applications may inadvertently reveal sensitive data through detailed error messages. To mitigate this risk, error handling mechanisms should be designed to provide generic error messages to end-users, while detailed error information is logged securely for internal review. This approach ensures that sensitive information, such as system configurations, stack traces, or personal data, is not exposed to unauthorized users.

The OWASP Secure Coding Practices emphasize the importance of error handling and logging to prevent information leakage:

"Ensure that error messages displayed to users do not reveal sensitive information that can be exploited by attackers."

After completing vulnerability scans and penetration analysis, security testers document the results to share with stakeholders, such as the organization’s largest customers. The deliverable being prepared in this context is the Security testing reports. These reports typically include detailed findings from the security assessments, explanations of the vulnerabilities discovered, the potential risks they pose, and recommendations for remediation. The purpose of these reports is to provide transparency about the security posture of the software or system and to guide the organization in addressing the identified security issues12. References: 1, 2

https://blog.halosecurity.com/what-really-matters-when-it-comes-to-pentesting-deliverables/

One of the four core values of the Agile Manifesto is prioritizing “individuals and interactions over processes and tools.” This value emphasizes the importance of the human element in software development, advocating for direct communication, collaboration, and the flexibility to adapt to change over strict adherence to rigid processes or reliance on specific tools. It recognizes that while processes and tools are important, they should serve the team and the individuals within it, rather than the other way around.

Bucket requirements are ongoing requirements that do not need to be addressed every sprint but must be completed before project completion. Identifying primary security and privacy contacts is a bucket requirement because it is a one-time, essential task that supports security governance throughout the project lifecycle. Every-sprint requirements (D) are repeated tasks for each sprint, one-time requirements (C) are tasks performed once usually early in the project, and final security review (B) occurs at project end. Agile SDL adaptation recommendations by Microsoft SDL and OWASP emphasize categorizing security tasks to fit iterative delivery, with bucket requirements ensuring important but non-iterative activities are not overlooked.

The privacy impact statement requirement that defines how personal information will be protected when authorized or independent external entities are involved is best categorized under Third party requirements. This aspect of privacy impact assessments ensures that personal data is safeguarded even when it is necessary to involve third parties, which could be service providers, partners, or other entities that might handle personal information on behalf of the primary organization. These requirements typically include stipulations for data handling agreements, security measures, and compliance checks to ensure that third parties maintain the confidentiality and integrity of the personal information they process.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

This is an example of Input validation, which involves ensuring all user inputs conform to expected formats, lengths, and content before processing. Restricting field lengths and validating accepted data types prevents injection attacks, buffer overflows, and improper data handling. Access control (B) restricts user permissions, communication security (C) protects data in transit, and data protection (D) focuses on confidentiality and integrity of stored data. OWASP Secure Coding Practices and Microsoft SDL emphasize rigorous input validation as a first line of defense against many vulnerabilities.

The step in threat modeling that involves collecting exploitable weaknesses within the product is Identify and document threats. This step is crucial as it directly addresses the identification of potential security issues that could be exploited. It involves a detailed examination of the system to uncover vulnerabilities that could be targeted by threats.

Option D best addresses security change management, here's why:

Focus on Change: The question directly asks about a modification to how remote administration is secured. This aligns with the core goal of security change management, which is to evaluate and control the security implications of changes to systems.

Security-Specific: The question is explicitly concerned with security, not general functionality or requirements.

Practical Aspect: Remote administration access is a frequent target for attackers, making it a common area for security change management scrutiny.

The activity being performed is the final privacy review. This step is crucial in the Ship phase of the Security Development Lifecycle (SDL), where the security team assesses if there are any changes or unresolved issues that could impact the requirements for handling personal information. These requirements are typically documented in the earlier stages of the development lifecycle, and the final privacy review ensures that the software complies with these requirements before release.

The phase being described is the Planning phase of the SDLC. This initial stage involves gathering business requirements and evaluating the feasibility of the project. It’s when the company leadership would typically meet with IT and other stakeholders to share visions for the future, discuss potential revenue streams, and determine the project’s direction before moving forward with development. This phase is crucial for setting the groundwork for all subsequent phases of the SDLC.

 Data flow analysis is a manual code review technique where the reviewer traces the path of data from its entry point in the software (input control) through its processing and manipulation within the application, to its exit points (outputs). This technique is used to ensure that the data is handled securely throughout its lifecycle within the application and to identify any potential security vulnerabilities that may arise from improper data handling or processing12

The OpenSAMM business function being assessed is Verification. This function involves activities related to reviewing and testing to ensure that the software meets the required security standards and practices. In the context of the question, the software security group’s focus on reviewing design artifacts to ensure compliance with organizational security standards falls under the Verification function. This includes tasks such as design review, implementation review, and security testing, which are all aimed at verifying that the security measures and controls are correctly integrated into the software design.

The Intelligence domain in the Building Security in Maturity Model (BSIMM) focuses on gathering and using information about software security. This includes understanding the types of attacks that are possible against the software being developed, which is why reviewing attack models falls under this domain. The BSIMM domain of Intelligence involves creating models of potential attacks on software (attack models), analyzing actual attacks that have occurred (attack intelligence), and sharing this information to improve security measures. By reviewing attack models, the software security group is essentially assessing the organization’s ability to anticipate and understand potential security threats, which is a key aspect of the Intelligence domain.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario outlines the process of decommissioning a legacy application after a new product has successfully taken over its functions. This corresponds to the End of Life phase in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC).

The End of Life phase involves retiring outdated systems and transitioning users to newer solutions. This phase ensures that obsolete applications are systematically phased out, reducing maintenance costs and potential security vulnerabilities associated with unsupported software.

In this case, running both the legacy and new applications concurrently provided a safety net to ensure the new system's stability. After confirming the new product's reliability, the organization proceeds to disable the legacy system, marking its End of Life.

In the PASTA (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) threat modeling methodology, vulnerability and exploit analysis is performed during the Attack modeling step. This step involves identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities within the system and understanding how they could be exploited.

Attack modeling is a critical phase where the focus is on simulating attacks based on identified vulnerabilities. It allows for a deep understanding of the threats in the context of the application’s architecture and system design.

During this phase, security analysts use their knowledge of the system’s technical scope and application decomposition to simulate how an attacker could exploit the system’s vulnerabilities. This helps in prioritizing the risks and planning appropriate mitigation strategies.

The goal of attack modeling is not just to identify vulnerabilities but also to understand the potential impact of exploits on the system and the business, which is essential for developing a robust security posture.

The privacy impact rating for an application that stores personally identifiable information (PII), monitors users with ongoing transfers of anonymous data, and changes settings without notifying the user would be P1 high privacy risk. Storing PII already poses a significant risk due to the potential for data breaches and misuse. Monitoring users and transferring data, even if anonymous, increases the risk as it involves ongoing data collection. Changing settings without user notification is a serious privacy concern because it can lead to unauthorized data processing or sharing, further elevating the risk level.