PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Sample Questions Answers

It is used to make system improvements using visualization and by controlling work in progress

It is an iterative timeboxed approach that helps teams generate value

It was originally focused in creating new companies and is now used to speed up product delivery

It has defined processes, products and roles used to iteratively deliver outputs using timeboxing

PRINCE2 is predictive, but not emergent

PRINCE2 is predictive and can be emergent

PRINCE2 requires a lengthy start to a project

PRINCE2 requires a disruptive start to a project

To create structure so that the team manager can assess individual performance

To evolve the effectiveness and behaviors of the self-organizing team by agreeing values

To make the team rules visible to the project manager for monitoring purposes

To ensure that the delivery team members comply with company policy

Effort remaining

Team working agreements

Actual amount of work done

Amount of time elapsed

The project board may pull reports from the information radiator

As a minimum, the project board should receive oral reports from the project manager

The project board should attend the delivery team’s daily stand up meeting

The project board should receive regular reports focusing on cost and time overruns

To make daily progress visible to the delivery team and key stakeholders

To encourage collaboration and create the defined outputs from the event

To communicate decisions to the wider stakeholder community

To make day-to-day decisions on behalf of the delivery team within a sprint

As disruptive

As something to be avoided

As a necessity

As inevitable

How to adapt the PRINCE2 management products

How to select which Agile framework should be favoured

How to decide whether PRINCE2 is appropriate

How to calculate the project budget and cost tolerance

Controlling a stage

Managing product delivery

Managing a stage boundary

Directing a project

When the MVP will be defined

That the MVP must go into operational use

What the MVP is

That the MVP is the same as project viability

1 and 2

2 and 3

3 and 4

1 and 4

It ensures that the level of quality is protected

It will lead to a lower cost of ownership

It is required in order to allow the team to self-organize

It results in the earth delivery of a minimum viable product

1 and 2

2 and 3

3 and 4

1 and 4

Work in progress limit

Information radiator

Highlight report

Glad! Sad! Mad!

What to remove and where to add guidance

Where to put the emphasis and where to add guidance

What to significantly change to create the right blend

Which areas are not enabled to work with agile

To track progress against the team plan

To create the project plan using empiricism

To enable team planning to be predictive

To plan by focusing on the features required

Requirements of a similar level of effort should be removed

More people should be added to the delivery team

The delivery milestones should be reviewed and re-planned

Formal change control should be applied

It ensures that there are no surprises

It allows people to provide cover for one another

It uses experimentation to expand requirements

It uses learning to help improve products

It prevents earlier phases of development being revisited

It uses an iterative and incremental approach

It focuses on responding to changing requirements

It delivers products more frequently in shorter phases

It gives confidence on the progress of the project

It can result in the early delivery of a minimum viable product

It allows misunderstandings to be dealt with appropriately

It is achieved by managing the culture of the team carefully

It is based on the concept of rationalism

It is shown by the ideal line on a bum-down chart

It describes how much work is getting done

It tracks the time and cost of a timebox

Work packages completed by the team

The rate of progress the team is making

The number of timeboxes completed

The speed that a minimum viable product is created

All quality criteria tolerance must be fixed

Quality tolerances should be the same for all quality criteria

Setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria

All quality criteria should have zero tolerance

1 and 2

2 and 3

3 and 4

1 and 4