PDI Sample Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In Lightning Web Components, to cache the results of Apex methods on the client side, the Apex method should be annotated with @AuraEnabled(cacheable=true). This enables the Lightning Data Service to cache the method's response, improving performance by reducing server calls.

Option B: To update a junction object, the user needsRead/Writeaccess to the primary relationship object.

Option C: The user must also haveRead/Writeaccess on the junction object itself.

Junction Objects Documentation

Pagination using aStandardSetControllerhelps manage large datasets by loading only a subset of records at a time. This approach minimizes view state size, which is critical for handling large datasets like 10,000+ records.

Declarative customizations, such as workflows, process builder, validation rules, and flows, offer a no-code approach to customizing Salesforce. Below are the key benefits:

Declarative customizations automatically update with each Salesforce release (A):Salesforce ensures that declarative tools are automatically updated during new releases, eliminating the need for manual intervention or code refactoring.

Option A: The Lightning Component Framework uses client-side rendering for improved performance and responsiveness.

Option B: Lightning components automatically adhere to accessibility standards (e.g., ARIA).

Option D: The framework allows for seamless integration with external libraries via JavaScript.

Not Suitable:

Option C: Lightning components are compatible with modern browsers but not all browsers.

Lightning Component Benefits

Why Quick Actions?

Quick Actions allow developers to create prepopulated forms for creating or updating records.

They are a modern alternative to JavaScript buttons in Lightning Experience.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Validation rules enforce data integrity but do not create records.

B: Apex triggers automate processes but are not used for user-initiated actions.

C: Record-triggered flows execute automatically when records are created or updated, but they do not replace JavaScript buttons for user-initiated actions.

The deployment fails because the Apex trigger has 0% test coverage. Even though the helper class is covered, Salesforce requires at least 1% test coverage for the trigger itself. To resolve this, a test class and methods must specifically invoke the trigger by performing DML operations on the related object.

Why Validation Rule?

Validation rules are efficient for enforcing field-level conditions without requiring Apex or Flow.

A formula can check if the user’s profile is not "Sales Manager" and if theLost Reasonfield is blank whenStatusis set to "Closed Lost".

Why Not Other Options?

A: Triggers are more complex and unnecessary for this simple validation.

C: Record-triggered flows are less efficient for field validations compared to validation rules.

D: Approval processes do not handle this type of field-level restriction.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A (Correct):AVisualforce quick actioncan include Apex logic for a callout, and Visualforce is still valid in Lightning Experience.

C (Correct):ALightning Web Component (or Aura component)exposed as aquick actioncan perform callouts via Apex when the user clicks a button. This supports a more modern UI experience.

Incorrect options:

B:@future(callout=true) works but cannot be triggeredsynchronously by a button press. It’s for background/automated processes.

D:Remote Actionis legacy functionality used with Visualforce/Aura and doesn't suit modern Lightning and button-driven synchronous actions.

Option A: Thefire()method is used to publish Aura application events in the traditional publish-subscribe model.

Not Suitable:

Option B:sendEvent()is not a valid method for Aura events.

Option C:FireEvent()does not exist.

Option D:emit()is not part of the Aura event framework.

Aura Application Events

Polymorphic Lookup Fields:

These fields can reference multiple object types.

Example: TheWhatIdfield on Event can reference any object that is related to the Event, such as Account or Opportunity.

Why Not Other Options?

A:ParentIdon Account is not polymorphic; it only points to other Accounts.

B: Custom fields cannot be polymorphic.

D:LeadIdandContactIdare specific fields, not polymorphic.

Option A (Apex Class): Trace flags can be configured for specific Apex classes to debug issues during their execution.

Option C (User): Trace flags can be set for specific users to debug issues occurring in their transactions.

Option E (Apex Trigger): Trace flags can be set for specific triggers to debug execution.

Not Suitable:

Option B (Flow): Trace flags cannot be configured for Flows directly.

Option D (Visualforce): Trace flags are not used to debug Visualforce pages directly.

Debug Logs and Trace Flags

LimitExceptioncannot be caught in atry-catchblock because it is thrown when governor limits are exceeded, and Salesforce does not allow further processing in such cases.

Other exceptions, such as custom exceptions,NoAccessException, orCalloutException, can be caught and handled.

Exceptions in Apex

B. Updates to FeedItem:

Triggers can fire when FeedItem records are updated, such as posts on records or Chatter updates.

C. Cascading delete operations:

When a parent record is deleted, cascading delete operations on related child records can trigger child object triggers.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Changing a user's default division does not fire triggers.

D: Renaming or replacing a picklist entry does not fire triggers.

Option A: Using variable binding eliminates the need for concatenating dynamic values in the query, which is the safest approach.

Option B: UsingString.escapeSingleQuotesensures special characters are handled safely, reducing the risk of SOQL injection.

Not Suitable:

Option C: Whilewith sharingensures sharing rules are applied, it does not prevent SOQL injection.

Option D: Regular expressions are not a reliable method for sanitizing input.

Preventing SOQL Injection

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A validation rule can be configured to prevent updates to Opportunity records in the Closed/Won stage by evaluating the Stage field and returning an error message when edits are attempted.

An Apex REST class can be used to retrieve real-time data from an external order management system. The flow can then call the REST class to display the retrieved data on the screen dynamically.

Public Method (A):The parent component can call a public method defined in the child component to pass data directly.

The code provided processes allCaserecords in a single transaction. Since it attempts to process over 10,000 records, it exceeds the Salesforce governor limit of 50,000 DML rows per transaction, causing the transaction to fail.

Governor Limits on DML Rows (C):Salesforce enforces a governor limit of 50,000 rows for DML operations per transaction. In this case, if theSELECTquery retrieves over 50,000 records, theDatabase.updatecall will hit this limit and throw aSystem.LimitException.

A try-catch block allows the batch to continue processing even if some records cause errors. Errors can be logged for review, ensuring the integration process does not stop entirely.

Visual Studio Code (VS Code)is the recommended tool for Salesforce development. It supports the Salesforce Extensions Pack for debugging and fixing issues in Lightning Web Components (LWCs).

Not Suitable:

Option A: The Developer Console is less effective for LWC debugging.

Option B: The Force.com IDE is deprecated.

Option C:Execute Anonymousdoes not provide tools to debug or fix LWC bugs.

VS Code with Salesforce Extensions Pack

Based on the provided code, an exception is likely being thrown if a required field is missing or if there are validation rules that the record does not meet. Salesforce will throw an exception when an attempt to create a record violates constraints.

Why not other options?

B: Salesforce reports errors for failed DML operations unless they are handled in atry-catchblock.

C: The record cannot be created successfully if constraints are violated.

D: Debug logs may provide details, but the record creation would fail.

Apex DML Exception Handling

Option A: This is the correct syntax for SOSL to retrieve data across multiple objects. It searches for "Universal Containers" in theCompanyNamefields and returns the specified fields forLead,Account, andContact.

Other Options:

Option BandD: These are invalid SOQL statements since SOQL does not support multi-object queries.

Option C:Namefields are not relevant to the search term "CompanyName."

SOSL Syntax

A. Unify all three triggers in a single trigger on the Expense__c object that includes all events:

Salesforce best practices recommend having only one trigger per object to avoid redundancy and conflicts.

By combining all the events (before delete, before insert, and before update) into a single trigger, the developer can manage the logic in an organized and maintainable manner.

This also simplifies debugging and ensures that the trigger logic executes in a predictable order.

C. Create helper classes to execute the appropriate logic when a record is saved:

Using helper classes allows for a clean separation of concerns. The trigger becomes a dispatcher that delegates logic to dedicated classes.

For example, you can create methods like applyDefaultsToExpense(), validateExpenseUpdate(), and deleteExpense() in a helper class and invoke them from the trigger.

This improves reusability, readability, and testability of the code.

Why not the other options?

B. Unify the before insert and before update triggers and use Flow for the delete action:

While Flow is a powerful tool, it is not ideal for deleting records or replacing Apex trigger functionality, especially when triggers already exist for other events.

D. Maintain all three triggers on the Expense__c object but move the Apex logic out of the trigger definition:

Maintaining multiple triggers on the same object can lead to conflicts and execution order issues, even if the logic is moved to helper classes.

Why Change Sets?

Change Sets are the recommended and simplest way to deploy metadata, including Apex code and Lightning Components, from Sandbox to Production.

Why Not Other Options?

A: The Force.com IDE is deprecated.

B: The Ant Migration Tool is more suitable for complex deployments but not necessary for standard Sandbox-to-Production migration.

D: Salesforce CLI is effective for deployment but requires scripting expertise, making Change Sets easier for most users.

Option A: Using aTest Data Factoryclass is a recommended approach to create test records programmatically. This ensures that the test is independent of existing data and can be executed in isolation.

Option B: The@IsTest(SeeAllData=true)annotation allows the test to access existing records in the database, includingPricing_Structure__c. However, this is less recommended as it creates a dependency on existing org data.

Not Suitable:

Option C:Test.loadDatais used to load records from a static resource (CSV) but doesn't suit the requirement directly.

Option D: Addingwithout sharingto a class impacts sharing rules but does not create or ensure the existence of test data.

Testing Best Practices

A. 75% Test Coverage:Salesforce mandates that 75% of all Apex code must be covered by tests to be deployable to production.

D. Trigger Coverage:Each Apex trigger must have at least one line of test coverage to ensure it is properly tested.

Why Lookup on Account to Global Address?

An Account can reference a single default Global Address via a lookup field, allowing multiple Accounts to share the same address.

This is more efficient than the reverse (lookup on Global Address to Account), as Global Address is the parent in this relationship.

Avoiding Master-Detail:

Lookup relationships provide flexibility in this use case since Accounts and Global Addresses have independent lifecycles.

Example:Create a custom lookup field on Account referencing the Global Address object.

This method allows the developer to retrieve all available record types and identify the default record type for the current user by checking theisDefaultRecordTypeMapping()attribute.

Example:

Schema.DescribeSObjectResult describeResult = Opportunity.sObjectType.getDescribe();

for (Schema.RecordTypeInfo recordType : describeResult.getRecordTypeInfos()) {

if (recordType.isDefaultRecordTypeMapping()) {

System.debug('Default Record Type: ' + recordType.getName());

}

}

Schema.RecordTypeInfo Methods

Why Prebuilt Components?

The Lightning Component Framework includes a library of prebuilt components, which developers can use to build applications faster.

Why Not Other Options?

A: The framework is exclusive to Lightning Experience, not Classic UI.

C: The framework does not provide templates but focuses on reusable components.

D: Extended governor limits are not provided by the framework.

When an Account record is created, the following happens:

Before insert triggerincrements the count field once.

After insert record-triggered flowexecutes and increments the count again.

When the record is subsequently updated:

Before update triggerincrements the count again.

After update record-triggered flowincrements it once more.

Thus, the final value of thecountfield =4.

Order of Execution in Salesforce

Scratch orgs are temporary, source-driven Salesforce environments used for development and testing. They allow developers to:

Work on independent features without interfering with each other's configurations.

Utilize a source-driven development model for CI/CD pipelines.

Scratch Orgs Overview

The Lightning component cannot directly perform SOQL queries.

An Apex class annotated with@AuraEnabledprovides server-side logic that can execute the SOQL query and return the data to the Lightning component.

Apex AuraEnabled Methods

To embed a Flow in an Aura component, thelightning:flowtag is used. It allows developers to interact with flows declaratively in Aura components.

The Apex Interactive Debugger allows developers to step through code execution in real time, which is the most effective way to identify the root cause of the duplication issue.

Option A (Developer Console):The Developer Console provides a detailed view of the execution logs and the status of Apex batch or future methods.

Option B (Apex Jobs):The Apex Jobs page in Salesforce Setup shows the status of queued, in-progress, or completed batch and scheduled jobs.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

D (Correct):Since Payment is avirtual class, it can beextended(not implemented like an interface), and its makePayment method is also virtual, which allows it to be overridden using the override keyword.

The use of override is required to redefine a virtual or abstract method from the parent class.

Why Re-Parentable Master-Detail Field?

A master-detail relationship allows Line Items to roll up totals (e.g., calculate total amount) to the Order.

Setting the relationship asre-parentablesupports moving Line Items between different Orders.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Lookup field: Does not support roll-up summary fields for calculations.

C and D: Relationships in the opposite direction (Order to Line Item) do not support the required logic.

isOK is declared but not initialized, so its default value is null.

In the condition checks:

The first if evaluates as false because isOK == false is false.

The second else if evaluates as false because isOK == true is false.

The third else if evaluates as true because isOK == null is true and theString == 'Hello' is also true.

So, the value assigned to x is 3.

Lightning Web Components (LWCs) have access to a variety of resources in Salesforce. Below are the supported resources:

Static Resources (A):You can use static resources to reference JavaScript libraries, images, and other files needed in an LWC.

C. Update the PrimaryId__c field definition to mark it as an External Id:

Marking PrimaryId__c as anExternal Idallows Salesforce to use this field to match records during the data import process, streamlining the process of mapping CSV rows to existing Candidate__c records.

External Id fields are indexed and can be used in tools likeData Loader,Data Import Wizard, orAPI-based upsertsto ensure that records are matched correctly based on the value of the external ID field.

In this case, since PrimaryId__c is unique, marking it as an external ID eliminates the need for custom triggers or flows.

Why this is the best solution?

This technique leverages built-in Salesforce capabilities (no need for custom code or automation).

It ensures accurate record matching and is the standard approach for data enrichment tasks involving unique identifiers.

Why not the other options?

A. Upload the CSV into a custom object related to Candidate__c:

This approach unnecessarily introduces another object, adding complexity. The goal is to update existing Candidate__c records, not store the data in a separate object.

B. Create a before insert trigger to correctly map the records:

Using triggers for this purpose is overengineering. Salesforce already provides tools likeupsertfor this exact use case. Writing a trigger would require additional effort and could introduce unintended errors or performance issues.

D. Create a before save flow to correctly map the records:

While flows are powerful, they are not the optimal solution for this use case. Data mapping is better handled using an external ID during import to ensure proper matching and updates.

A roll-up summary field is the best practice for aggregating values (e.g., sum, count, or average) from child records in a master-detail relationship. This feature automatically calculates the sum of all Order Line item totals and displays it on the parent Order record.

WhyWITH SECURITY_ENFORCED?

Ensures field-level security and sharing rules are enforced in SOQL queries.

Prevents unauthorized records or fields from being accessed or displayed.

Why Not Other Options?

B and C:with sharingandinherited sharingenforce record-level access but do not handle field-level security.

D:without sharingignores sharing rules, which would display all records regardless of user permissions.

When troubleshooting batch Apex jobs:

Asynchronous Job Monitoring:

Navigate toSetup > Apex Jobsto view the status of the batch job.

Provides information such as success, errors, and total execution time.

This step is crucial to diagnose whether the issue is with system limits, batch size, or specific records.

Debug Logs:

After identifying the issue in the job monitoring page, use debug logs to pinpoint specific errors or bottlenecks.

B. Check the debug logs for the batch job: Debug logs are a secondary step after checking the job status.

C. Disable and recreate with fewer records: Premature without investigating the root cause.

D. Decrease the batch size: Adjusting batch size is a solution but only after identifying the cause of the timeout.

Declaring the constant asstaticensures it is shared across all instances of the class.

Declaring it asfinalensures its value cannot be modified after initialization.

Static and Final Variables in Apex

Why Queueable Class?

Queueable Apex supports callouts and allows chaining to process one record at a time efficiently.

The trigger detects when theOrder__cstatus changes to "Placed" and enqueues the Queueable class to perform the callout.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Batchable class: Batch jobs are ideal for bulk processing but not suited for single REST callouts.

C. Flow with invocable method: Flows are less efficient and limited in handling callouts for large-scale operations.

D. @future method: While it supports asynchronous callouts, it does not allow chaining, making Queueable more suitable.

B: Salesforce requires that all Apex code have at least 75% test coverage in production before deployment. This ensures that the system remains reliable.

C: All triggers must have some test coverage as part of the overall 75% requirement for Apex code.

Why not other options?

A: Object visibility settings are not a deployment requirement.

D: Visual Flows do not require test coverage for deployment to production.

Apex Test Coverage Requirements

Creating test classes ensures that the Apex class works according to specifications by validating the functionality under various scenarios and edge cases. Running tests in the Developer Console provides detailed feedback on whether the class meets requirements.

75% Code Coverage (A):To deploy Apex code to production, Salesforce requires at least 75% of the code to be covered by tests across the organization.

A Global Picklist Value Set allows the same set of picklist values to be shared across multiple objects, making maintenance easier and ensuring consistency.

Why not other options?

B: Alphabetical ordering does not ensure consistent value maintenance across objects.

C: Validation rules do not streamline picklist value maintenance.

D: Restricting picklist values helps ensure data integrity but does not streamline maintenance across objects.

Global Picklists Documentation

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine which SOQL queries are safe from SOQL injection, we need to evaluate each option for how it handles the name parameter (user input from a Visualforce page) and whether it properly mitigates the risk of SOQL injection. SOQL injection occurs when untrusted user input is directly embedded into a query string, allowing malicious users to manipulate the query’s logic. Let’s analyze each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation, particularly the Secure Coding Guidelines and Apex Developer Guide.

Understanding SOQL Injection:

SOQL Injection: This vulnerability arises when user input is dynamically concatenated into a SOQL query string without proper sanitization, allowing an attacker to alter the query’s behavior. For example, if name is ' OR '1'='1, an unsafe query might return all records instead of the intended subset. The Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines state: “SOQL injection occurs when untrusted input is concatenated into a query string, potentially allowing an attacker to bypass intended logic” (Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines, SOQL Injection).

Prevention Techniques:

Bind Variables (:variable): Using bind variables in SOQL queries ensures user input is treated as a value, not part of the query logic, preventing injection. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “Using bind variables (:variable) in SOQL queries is the safest way to prevent SOQL injection” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Secure Coding for SOQL).

Sanitization: If dynamic SOQL (e.g., Database.query()) is used, user input must be sanitized using methods like String.escapeSingleQuotes() to escape special characters (e.g., single quotes) that could alter the query.

Context: The name variable comes from a Visualforce page, meaning it’s untrusted user input and must be handled carefully to prevent injection.

Evaluating the Options:

A.

apex

Copy

String query = '%' + name + '%';

List results = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE :query];

Approach: Constructs a query string by concatenating wildcards (%) with the name variable, then uses a bind variable (:query) in the SOQL query.

Security: Using a bind variable (:query) ensures that the value of query (which includes name) is treated as a literal value in the LIKE clause, not as part of the query’s syntax. Even if name contains malicious input (e.g., ' OR '1'='1), the SOQL engine treats it as a single string to match against Name, preventing injection. The Apex Developer Guide confirms: “Bind variables prevent SOQL injection by treating user input as data, not executable code” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Secure Coding for SOQL).

Example: If name = 'Test' OR '1'='1, then query = '%Test' OR '1'='1%'. The SOQL query becomes:

apex

Copy

[SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE '%Test\' OR \'1\'=\'1%']

This searches for records where Name matches the literal string %Test' OR '1'='1%, which is safe and does not alter the query logic.

Conclusion: Safe from SOQL injection due to the use of a bind variable.

B.

apex

Copy

String query = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE \'%' + name.noQuotes() + '%\'';

List results = Database.query(query);

Approach: Dynamically constructs a SOQL query string by concatenating name.noQuotes() into the query, then executes it using Database.query().

Security: The noQuotes() method is not a standard Apex method on the String class. The Apex Developer Guide does not define noQuotes() as a built-in method (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, String Class). Assuming it’s a custom method, it likely attempts to remove quotes from the string, but this does not prevent SOQL injection. Concatenating user input directly into the query string is inherently unsafe unless properly sanitized.

Example: If name = 'Test' OR '1'='1, and assuming noQuotes() does nothing (or removes quotes, which doesn’t help), the query becomes:

apex

Copy

SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE '%Test' OR '1'='1%'

The OR '1'='1' condition evaluates to true for all records, returning all Accounts, which is a successful SOQL injection attack.

Conclusion: Not safe, as it directly concatenates user input without proper sanitization or bind variables, and noQuotes() is not a reliable or standard method for preventing injection.

C.

apex

Copy

String query = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE \'%' + String.escapeSingleQuotes(name) + '%\'';

List results = Database.query(query);

Approach: Dynamically constructs a SOQL query string by concatenating name into the query after applying String.escapeSingleQuotes(), then executes it using Database.query().

Security: The String.escapeSingleQuotes() method escapes single quotes in the input by adding a backslash (\), preventing the input from breaking out of the string literal in the SOQL query. The Apex Developer Guide states: “String.escapeSingleQuotes() prevents SOQL injection in dynamic queries by escaping single quotes, ensuring the input cannot alter the query structure” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, String Class). This ensures that even malicious input cannot manipulate the query logic.

Example: If name = 'Test' OR '1'='1, then String.escapeSingleQuotes(name) returns Test\' OR \'1\'=\'1. The query becomes:

apex

Copy

SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE '%Test\' OR \'1\'=\'1%'

This searches for records where Name matches the literal string %Test' OR '1'='1%, which is safe and does not allow the OR condition to execute as logic.

Conclusion: Safe from SOQL injection due to the use of String.escapeSingleQuotes() to sanitize the user input in a dynamic query.

D.

apex

Copy

String query = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE \'%' + name + '%\'';

List results = Database.query(query);

Approach: Dynamically constructs a SOQL query string by directly concatenating name into the query, then executes it using Database.query().

Security: This approach is vulnerable to SOQL injection because name is directly embedded into the query string without sanitization. The Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines warn: “Directly concatenating user input into a dynamic SOQL query without escaping can lead to SOQL injection” (Salesforce Secure Coding Guidelines, SOQL Injection).

Example: If name = 'Test' OR '1'='1, the query becomes:

apex

Copy

SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE '%Test' OR '1'='1%'

The OR '1'='1' condition evaluates to true for all records, returning all Accounts, demonstrating a successful SOQL injection attack.

Conclusion: Not safe, as it directly concatenates user input without sanitization or bind variables.

Why Options A and C are Correct:

Option A: Uses a bind variable (:query) in the SOQL query, ensuring that the user input (name) is treated as a literal value, not executable code. This is the most secure way to prevent SOQL injection, as recommended by Salesforce.

Option C: Uses String.escapeSingleQuotes() to sanitize the user input before embedding it into a dynamic SOQL query, preventing the input from altering the query’s logic. This is a safe approach for dynamic queries when bind variables cannot be used directly.

Options B and D: Both concatenate user input directly into the query string without adequate sanitization (noQuotes() is not a standard or reliable method in B, and D has no sanitization), making them vulnerable to SOQL injection.

Example of Vulnerability (Option D):

Consider a Visualforce page where name is set via a user input field:

apex

Copy

String name = ApexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('name');

String query = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE \'%' + name + '%\'';

List results = Database.query(query);

If a malicious user submits name = ' OR '1'='1, the query becomes:

apex

Copy

SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE '%' OR '1'='1%'

This returns all Accounts, bypassing the intended filtering, which is a successful SOQL injection attack.

Mitigating SOQL Injection:

Preferred (Option A): Use bind variables whenever possible:

apex

Copy

String query = '%' + name + '%';

List results = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE :query];

Alternative (Option C): If dynamic SOQL is required, sanitize input with String.escapeSingleQuotes():

apex

Copy

String query = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE \'%' + String.escapeSingleQuotes(name) + '%\'';

List results = Database.query(query);

Handling Typos:

The options are syntactically correct in the provided image, with no typos to address.

Option B’s name.noQuotes() is not a standard Apex method, but the analysis assumes it’s a custom method that fails to prevent injection, as it’s not a recognized sanitization technique.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)is the best model for the scenario described because it provides on-demand access to compute, storage, and networking resources that are ideal for a scalable server cluster. IaaS allows the engineering team to rent infrastructure resources without having to invest in physical hardware, making it perfect for temporary or fluctuating workloads, such as scalability testing.

Key Characteristics of IaaS:

Full control over the operating systems and applications running on the servers.

Flexible resource allocation to support high scalability.

Ideal for custom software testing where specific server configurations may be needed.

Why not the other options?

PaaS (Platform as a Service):While PaaS is excellent for application development and deployment, it abstracts the infrastructure layer, which would limit the engineering team's control over the cluster's configuration.

SaaS (Software as a Service):SaaS delivers fully managed applications, not infrastructure or testing environments. It’s irrelevant for this use case.

BaaS (Backend as a Service):BaaS is tailored to mobile or web application backend development, providing APIs and pre-built services, not infrastructure for a server cluster.

Platform Developer References:

While this question is broader than Salesforce-specific concepts, understandingIaaS vs. PaaSis relevant when working with Salesforce development. For example:

Salesforce operates as aPaaS(e.g., Force.com platform), allowing developers to build and deploy applications without managing underlying servers.

Testing scalability and performance at an infrastructure level (as in the question) would fall underIaaSconcepts, which Salesforce developers might encounter when integrating external services or infrastructure like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.

This foundational knowledge complements your understanding of cloud services in the Salesforce ecosystem.

TheTest menu in the Developer Consoleallows the developer to run specific or all test classes, ensuring that the trigger works correctly without affecting production data. Test methods in Salesforce run in an isolated environment and do not modify the actual data.

Why not other options?

A: Deploying code does not confirm that the trigger works correctly.

B: Creating a new Contact directly modifies production data, which is not recommended.

D: Executing a DML statement in Execute Anonymous directly affects production data and is not a safe testing method.

Testing Apex Triggers

Flow Builder:

Flow Builder can evaluate record criteria using a Decision element and then send an outbound message using the "Action" element.

Allows automation without Apex.

Approval Process:

Approval Processes can evaluate criteria and trigger outbound messages as one of the associated actions.

Why Not Other Options?

C. Entitlement Process: Focuses on managing entitlements, not triggering outbound messages.

D. Next Best Action: Used for recommendations and guided actions, not for triggering outbound messages.

Why Create Records Element?

TheCreate Recordselement adds the functionality to create a Contact record.

The Contact’s ID can then be stored on the Opportunity using a variable or field update.

Why Not Other Options?

A:Update Recordsis for updating existing records, not creating new ones.

B:Roll Back Recordsis used for rolling back transactions, not for creating records.

D:Get Recordsretrieves records but does not create them.

A. Debug logs can be set for specific users, classes, and triggers:

Debug logs can be configured for users, classes, and triggers by setting trace flags.

C. Only the 20 most recent debug logs for a user are kept:

Salesforce retains only the 20 most recent debug logs per user. Older logs are overwritten.

E. The maximum size of a debug log is 5 MB:

Debug logs are capped at 5 MB. If this limit is exceeded, logging stops for that transaction.

Why Not B and D?

B: Debug logs are retained for7 days, not 24 hours.

D: Debug log levels are not cumulative. Each level is independent.

SOSL:

Designed for full-text searches, making it faster for unstructured or broad text searches across multiple objects.

Ideal for searching multiple fields simultaneously.

SOQL:

Optimized for structured queries where you need more control over filtering and relationships.

Can return up to 50,000 records in a single query, while SOSL returns only 2,000.

CandDare incorrect because SOSL is faster for text searches, not SOQL.

Many-to-Many Relationship:

To track which companies (Accounts) report which bugs and allow multiple associations for both, ajunction objectis needed.

This junction object will have two master-detail relationships: one toBug__cand one toAccount.

Why Not Other Options?

A. Roll-up summary field: Not suitable for many-to-many relationships.

B. Master-detail field on Bug__c to Account: Creates a one-to-many relationship, not many-to-many.

C. Lookup field on Bug__c to Account: Still creates a one-to-many relationship, not many-to-many.