1z0-1050-24 Sample Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

For a flow pattern to be available under "Submit a Payroll Flow" in Oracle Payroll Cloud, its status must be set to "Active" with a usage of "Process," "Report," or "Payroll Flow." This ensures the flow is executable and visible to users for submission. Option A is incomplete (missing "Payroll Flow"), Option B is not a standard status format, and Option D ("Flow Pattern Submission") is not a valid status. The documentation under "Payroll Flow Patterns" specifies these statuses for flow availability.

ALegislative Data Group (LDG)in Oracle Payroll Cloud groups payroll data by legislation and is tied to a single legislative code and currency (Option D). It can include multiple legal entities acting as payroll statutory units (Option A) and marks the legislation under which payroll is processed (Option C). However, Option B is incorrect because an LDG is associated with onlyone cost allocation key flexfield structureat a time, not multiple. This structure defines how costs are allocated within the LDG, and associating multiple structures would violate the integrity of payroll costing rules within a single legislative context, as per Oracle’s design.

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, incomplete flows on the payroll dashboard indicate that a payroll process (e.g., Calculate Payroll) has not fully completed due to errors or interruptions. To resolve this and remove the flow from the dashboard, the recommended action is torollback all tasksfrom the Payroll Calculation Work Area (Option B). Rolling back the tasks reverses the incomplete process, allowing users to address any issues (e.g., data errors) and resubmit the flow. Option A (skip all tasks) does not resolve the underlying issue and leaves the flow incomplete. Option C (complete flow action) is not a valid action for an incomplete flow, as completion requires successful task execution. Option D (delete flow action) is not applicable, as flows cannot be arbitrarily deleted from the dashboard without proper resolution. The rollback action ensures data integrity and is the standard approach per Oracle documentation.

To integrate Fusion Absences with Fusion Global Payroll, additional steps beyond creating absence elements and plans are required. Option A involves selecting the"Transfer absence payment information for payroll processing"checkbox on the absence plan and linking the absence element, which enables the transfer of absence data to payroll for processing. Option D requires creating anAbsence Calculation Card, which stores the absence details (e.g., dates and units) and ensures they are available for payroll calculations. Option B (manual entry of absence units) is not necessary, as the integration automates this process. Option C (element eligibility) is a standard step in element setup but not specific to the absence-to-payroll transfer process beyond initial configuration. Oracle documentation specifies these steps for seamless absence processing in payroll.

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, when an element is created with the "Timecard" category, it is designed to capture time-related data, such as overtime hours, directly from timecard entries. The default input value generated for such elements is named"Hours", which holds the number of hours entered or processed (e.g., overtime hours). This is a standard configuration for timecard-related elements, as outlined in Oracle documentation. Option A ("Hours Worked") and Option B ("Hours Calculated") are not standard input values automatically created for a "Timecard" category element; these might be custom input values if explicitly defined. Option C is incorrect because a "Timecard" category element does create input values, with "Hours" being the primary one for capturing time data.

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, atax reporting unit (TRU)is created as part of the payroll statutory unit (PSU) setup. When a legal entity is identified as a PSU, the application automatically transfers its associatedlegal reporting units (LRUs)to HCM as TRUs (Option A). This ensures tax reporting aligns with the legislative requirements of the PSU. Option B is incorrect, as there’s no optional step to designate the PSU as a TRU—it’s automatic. Option C (directly identifying a legal entity as a TRU) bypasses the PSU linkage, which is not supported. Option D (legal employer) is inaccurate, as TRUs are tied to PSUs, not legal employers. Oracle documentation confirms this automatic transfer process.

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, when an element is created with the "Timecard" category, it is designed to capture time-related data, such as overtime hours, directly from timecard entries. The default input value generated for such elements is named"Hours", which holds the number of hours entered or processed (e.g., overtime hours). This is a standard configuration for timecard-related elements, as outlined in Oracle documentation. Option A ("Hours Worked") and Option B ("Hours Calculated") are not standard input values automatically created for a "Timecard" category element; these might be custom input values if explicitly defined. Option C is incorrect because a "Timecard" category element does create input values, with "Hours" being the primary one for capturing time data.

ALegislative Data Group (LDG)in Oracle Payroll Cloud groups payroll data by legislation and is tied to a single legislative code and currency (Option D). It can include multiple legal entities acting as payroll statutory units (Option A) and marks the legislation under which payroll is processed (Option C). However, Option B is incorrect because an LDG is associated with onlyone cost allocation key flexfield structureat a time, not multiple. This structure defines how costs are allocated within the LDG, and associating multiple structures would violate the integrity of payroll costing rules within a single legislative context, as per Oracle’s design.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, element eligibility can be defined using Business Unit as a criterion for an assignment-level element like Onsite Allowance. The correct approach is to create multiple eligibility records—one for BU2 and one for BU3—specifying the Business Unit in the eligibility criteria. Option A is incorrect, as Business Unit is a supported criterion. Option C (Open Eligibility) bypasses automatic restriction, requiring manual entry, and Option D (Payroll Relationship level) is unnecessary and misaligned with the assignment-level requirement. This is covered in the "Element Eligibility" section.

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, if no specific owner is indicated in the payroll flow definition, theuser who submits the payroll flowbecomes the default owner of the tasks within that flow (Option C). This ensures accountability and visibility for the submitter, who can then monitor and manage the flow’s progress. Options A, B, and D (based on roles) are incorrect because ownership defaults to the individual submitter, not a role-based group, unless explicitly overridden in the flow definition (e.g., by assigning a group or role). Oracle documentation specifies this default behavior for flow ownership.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Payroll Cloud, when a payroll flow task is configured with "Bind to Flow Task Parameter," it retrieves its parameter value from the output of the previous task in the flow. This allows for dynamic data passing between tasks within the same flow instance, enhancing automation and dependency management. Option A (user-entered value) applies to manual inputs, not binding. Option B (SQL Bind) refers to database queries, not task outputs, and Option D (flow instance context) is less specific and not the direct source in this context. The Oracle documentation explains this under "Payroll Flow Parameters."