PSPO-II Sample Questions Answers

According to the Scrum Guide, the purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness. The Scrum Team inspects how the last Sprint went with regards to individuals, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done1. Therefore, all of the options A, B, C, and D are possible topics that the Scrum Team might discuss during a Sprint Retrospective, as they relate to the aspects that the team can improve or adapt. For example, the team might discuss how to communicate better, how to plan the Sprint more effectively, how to acquire new skills or knowledge, or how to update their Definition of Done23. The Sprint Retrospective is a formal opportunity for the team to focus on inspection and adaptation, and to identify the most helpful changes to implement in the next Sprint1.

According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II certification guide1, the Definition of Done is a formal description of the state of the Increment when it meets the quality measures required for the product. The Definition of Done creates transparency by providing everyone a shared understanding of what work was completed and what standards were met as part of the Increment. If the Definition of Done is not met, the Increment is not Done and cannot be released. Therefore, the following statements are true:

• A. The next Sprint may be interrupted when quality issues are encountered. This is true because the Scrum Team may have to spend time fixing the quality issues in the previous Increment before working on the new Sprint Backlog items. This may affect the Sprint Goal and the delivery of value.
• C. The indication of progress on the Product Backlog is not transparent. This is true because the Product Backlog items that were supposedly Done in the previous Sprint are actually not Done according to the Definition of Done. This means that the Product Owner cannot accurately forecast the release plan and the stakeholders cannot trust the progress reports.
• D. The Scrum Team should not release the Increment. This is true because releasing an Increment that does not meet the Definition of Done may compromise the quality, usability, and value of the product. It may also damage the reputation and trust of the Scrum Team and the organization.
• E. The incomplete Sprint Backlog items should be returned to the Product Backlog. This is true because the Sprint Backlog items that were not Done according to the Definition of Done are still part of the Product Backlog. The Product Owner should re-order them based on their value and priority and decide when to include them in the next Sprint.

The following statement is false:

• B. The project manager cannot effectively update the plan. This is false because there is no project manager role in Scrum. The Product Owner is responsible for managing the Product Backlog and the value delivery, while the Scrum Master is responsible for facilitating the Scrum process and removing impediments. The Developers are responsible for managing the Sprint Backlog and the quality of the Increment.

References: 1: Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification | Scrum.org

• Option A is correct because talking to users is one of the best ways to understand their needs, goals, and pain points. By spending more time with them, you can identify the impact they seek from your product and how your features align with that impact. This will help you validate your assumptions and learn from your customers12.
• Option B is incorrect because disabling features that have never been used is a risky and potentially harmful action. It may cause frustration and confusion for the users who rely on those features, or who may want to use them in the future. It may also damage your reputation and trust with your customers. Instead of disabling features, you should seek feedback from your users and understand why they are not using them34.
• Option C is correct because running experiments is a powerful way to increase your understanding of what customers find valuable. By testing different hypotheses and measuring the outcomes, you can learn from your data and evidence. You can also use experiments to validate your ideas and assumptions before investing in building features5 .
• Option D is correct because examining whether the rarely used features solve the intended problem is a crucial step to evaluate your product performance. You should review your product vision and goals, and assess how your features contribute to them. You should also analyze the feedback and data you have collected from your users and stakeholders, and identify any gaps or mismatches between your features and their needs .

References:

• 1: Product Backlog Management
• 2: Stakeholders & Customers
• 3: Product Value
• 4: Evidence-Based Management
• 5: Product Vision
• : Forecasting & Release Planning
• : [Business Strategy](https://www

• A. Reorder items in the Product Backlog: The Product Owner is responsible for ordering the Product Backlog to maximize value12.
• B. Answer questions from the Developers about items in the current Sprint: The Product Owner is engaged throughout the sprint, answering questions on how things are supposed to function & look4.
• E. Gather information and opinions from stakeholders: Gathering information and opinions from stakeholders is a key activity for the Product Owner, as it helps in understanding the value and ordering the Product Backlog

Unrealized Value is the value that could be realized by meeting all potential needs of the customer or user1. It represents the opportunity for growth and innovation. When the Unrealized Value of a product is very small, it means that the product has reached a saturation point in the market, and there is little room for improvement or differentiation. Investing more in such a product would not yield much return, and might even cannibalize the Current Value of the product, which is the value delivered to the customer or user today1. Therefore, organizations should reduce their investment in a product when its Unrealized Value is very small, and focus on other products or opportunities that have higher Unrealized Value

A is correct because forming products that are as independent as possible reduces the complexity and dependency of the product development, and allows each product to deliver value faster and more frequently1. Coordination among the products is still necessary to ensure alignment and consistency, but it should not be centralized or imposed by a higher authority2. B is incorrect because creating a centralized, coordinated cross-product Development Plan goes against the principles of empiricism, self-organization, and agility that Scrum promotes3. C is incorrect because appointing a Project Lead to oversee all the products undermines the accountability and autonomy of the Product Owners and the Scrum Teams4. D is incorrect because ensuring that the PMO manages the inter-product dependencies creates a layer of bureaucracy and control that hinders the collaboration and innovation of the Scrum Teams5. E is incorrect because it includes all the wrong answers.

If Product Backlog items are not sufficiently clear during Sprint Planning, the Developers will typically have difficulty creating a forecast of work for the Sprint (B). This is because the clarity of the Product Backlog items is crucial for the Developers to understand what is expected and to plan their work accordingly. The Scrum framework emphasizes the importance of a well-refined Product Backlog for effective Sprint Planning

Frequent product releases are beneficial for several reasons. They enable teams to inspect and adapt more frequently, which means they can get faster feedback, validate their assumptions, and improve their product incrementally. They help teams better understand and meet customer needs, which means they can deliver more value, increase customer satisfaction, and build trust and loyalty. They help teams to learn how to correct and eliminate errors, which means they can reduce waste, improve quality, and prevent technical debt. Smaller, more frequent releases are less risky, which means they can reduce uncertainty, avoid big-bang failures, and enable faster recovery123. References: 1: Managing Products with Agility 2: Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework 3: Evolving the Agile Organization

D is correct because the timebox for the Sprint Review is four hours or less for a one-month Sprint, and usually shorter for shorter Sprints1. The Sprint Review is an event where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders inspect the outcome of the Sprint and collaborate on what to do next1. A is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not an open-ended event, but a timeboxed one that respects the attendees’ time and ensures productivity2. B is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not a point in time, but a timeboxed event that has a specific purpose and agenda1. C is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not the same as the Daily Scrum, which is a 15-minute event for the Developers to synchronize their work1.

• Self-Management: The Developers have autonomy over how they achieve the Sprint Goal. The Sprint Backlog reflects their plan for turning Product Backlog items into a valuable Increment.
• Accountability: The Developers are held accountable for delivering the Sprint Goal, and thus own the detailed plan within the Sprint Backlog.
• Scrum Guide: The Scrum Guide explicitly states, "The Sprint Backlog is a plan by and for the Developers"

According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II guide, one of the key competencies of a Product Owner is to validate product assumptions and hypotheses using empirical evidence1. This means that instead of investing a lot of money and time into building a product based on unproven ideas, the Product Owner should conduct small experiments to test the viability, desirability, and feasibility of the product2. These experiments can take various forms, such as prototypes, mockups, surveys, interviews, landing pages, etc. The goal is to gather feedback from real or potential users and customers, and measure the outcomes against predefined success criteria3. Based on the results of the experiments, the Product Owner can then decide whether to persevere, pivot, or terminate the product idea4. This approach helps to reduce the risk of wasting resources on products that nobody wants or needs, and to focus on the most valuable and promising ideas.

According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II certification guide1, the Sprint Goal is the single objective for the Sprint. It is a commitment made by the Scrum Team during Sprint Planning. The Sprint Goal provides guidance to the Developers on why it is valuable to build a coherent Increment. The Product Owner proposes how the product could increase its value and utility in the current Sprint. The whole Scrum Team then collaborates to define a Sprint Goal that communicates why the Sprint is valuable to stakeholders. The Product Owner should not dictate the Sprint Goal, but rather collaborate with the Developers and the Scrum Master to create a shared understanding and alignment. The other options are not activities that a Product Owner should never do, because they are either part of the Product Owner’s accountabilities (A, C, D) or may be done in collaboration with others (A, D). References: 1: Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification | Scrum.org

According to the PSPO II resources, a product owner should optimize the value of the product and the work of the Scrum Team1. One way to do this is to improve the value experienced by the customer, which is the perception and evaluation of the product by the customer2. A price increase can be justified if the customer perceives that the product delivers more value than the cost3. This can be achieved by enhancing the product quality, functionality, usability, or design, or by providing additional benefits or services to the customer4. The other options are not effective ways to justify a price increase, as they may either reduce the value experienced by the customer, or increase the cost without increasing the value. References:

• 1: The Scrum Guide
• 2: User Experience
• 3: Value-Based Pricing
• 4: 8 Techniques to Justify a Price Increase
• : Justification for a Price Increase: Positioning For Success

The Sprint Backlog is the set of Product Backlog items selected for the Sprint, plus a plan for delivering the product Increment and realizing the Sprint Goal1. The Sprint Backlog is a forecast by the Developers about what functionality will be in the next Increment and the work needed to deliver that functionality into a “Done” Increment2. The Sprint Backlog is a plan with enough detail that changes in progress can be understood in the Daily Scrum2. The Developers modify the Sprint Backlog throughout the Sprint, and the Sprint Backlog emerges during the Sprint. This emergence occurs as the Developers work through the plan and learn more about the work needed to achieve the Sprint Goal2. The Sprint Backlog is not a commitment to deliver a fixed scope of work, but rather a forecast of what the Developers believe they can do in the Sprint3. Therefore, the Sprint Backlog does not need to be fully defined during the Sprint Planning, but only enough so the Developers can create a realistic forecast of what they can do during the Sprint. References: 1: Sprint Backlog, 2: The Scrum Guide, 3: Commitment vs. Forecast

According to the PSPO II guide and Scrum.org competencies, when ordering Product Backlog items, a Product Owner should consider various factors to maximize the value of the work done by the Scrum Team. These factors include:

• A. Dependencies to other products: Recognizing dependencies to other products is crucial for the Product Owner to ensure that the Scrum Team is working on items that can be completed and deliver value without being blocked by external dependencies.
• B. Value of Product Backlog items: The primary role of a Product Owner is to maximize the value delivered by the Scrum Team, and ordering items based on their value is a fundamental aspect of this responsibility.
• C. Dependencies between Product Backlog items: Understanding and managing dependencies between Product Backlog items helps in planning Sprints more effectively, ensuring that the team is working on items in a logical sequence.
• D. Cost of delay: The cost of delay is a critical economic factor that influences the ordering of Product Backlog items. Items that would result in a higher cost if delayed should be prioritized.
• E. Cost of implementation: While value maximization is the goal, the cost of implementation cannot be ignored. Balancing the cost and the expected value is essential for effective Product Backlog management.

These considerations are in line with the Scrum.org Professional Scrum competencies, particularly under 'Managing Products with Agility', where it's emphasized that Product Owners should have a deep understanding of market value, product feasibility, and the importance of making trade-offs to maximize value.

 The smallest product Increment that is valuable enough to release is one that delivers a single new or improved outcome for the customers or users of the product. This is because the outcome is the ultimate measure of value, not the output or the features1. An outcome is a change in behavior, attitude, or situation that results from using the product2. An outcome can be achieved by delivering a single feature, fixing a defect, or improving an existing functionality, as long as it meets the Definition of Done and the Sprint Goal3. Therefore, the best answer is A.

The other options are not correct because:

• B. Adds a new feature. This is not a sufficient condition, as a new feature may not deliver a valuable outcome if it is not aligned with the product vision, the customer needs, or the market conditions4.
• C. Fixes at least one defect. This is not a necessary condition, as a defect may not affect the value of the product if it is minor, rare, or irrelevant to the customer5.
• D. Delivers all “must do” Product Backlog items. This is not a realistic condition, as the Product Backlog is a dynamic and emergent artifact that changes based on feedback, learning, and discovery. There is no fixed set of “must do” items that can guarantee the delivery of value. References: 1: Outcome vs. Output, 2: What is an Outcome?, 3: The Definition of Done, 4: Feature vs. Outcome, 5: Defect vs. Value, : The Product Backlog

The value of a product is not determined by how many features it has, how much it costs, or how fast it is delivered, but by how well it meets the needs and expectations of the customers and stakeholders. Therefore, the best measure of value is how often and how effectively the customers use the product to achieve their goals and solve their problems. This can be assessed by using metrics such as customer satisfaction, retention, engagement, loyalty, referrals, revenue, or any other indicators that reflect the desired outcomes and benefits of the product.

The other options are not the best measures of value, because they either focus on the output rather than the outcome, or they do not reflect the customer perspective. The number of “must-do” Product Backlog items delivered in a release may indicate the scope or the quality of the product, but not necessarily the value. The average cost of the product release may indicate the efficiency or the profitability of the product, but not necessarily the value. The on-schedule performance of the Scrum Team may indicate the predictability or the agility of the product development process, but not necessarily the value. References := Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification, Managing Products with Agility, Evidence-Based Management