EDGE-Expert Sample Questions Answers

The post-construction stage in EDGE certification requires evidence to confirm that the efficiency measures claimed in the design stage have been implemented as specified. For window glazing, which affects energy efficiency through its U-value (thermal transmittance) and SHGC (Solar Heat Gain Coefficient), the EDGE Certification Protocol provides clear requirements: "At the post-construction stage, the Client must provide manufacturer’s data sheets for the window glazing measure, showing the make and model, U-value, and SHGC of the installed glass, to confirm that the glazing matches the specifications claimed in the self-assessment and meets the energy efficiency requirements" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements). Option C, manufacturer’s data sheets showing the make and model, U-value, and SHGC of the installed glass, directly matches this requirement, as it provides the specific technical data needed to verify compliance. Option A (design building elevations marking the window glass specifications) is relevant at the design stage, not post-construction: "Design elevations are required at the preliminary stage to show intended glazing specifications, not after construction" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option B (bill of quantities with specifications highlighted) is insufficient on its own, as it may not provide detailed technical data: "Bills of quantities may support purchase verification, but manufacturer’s data sheets are required for technical specifications like U-value and SHGC" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements). Option D (window schedule showing major glass types) is helpful but not sufficient, as it lacks the detailed technical data: "Window schedules may indicate glass types, but they do not replace the need for manufacturer’s data sheets with U-value and SHGC at post-construction" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.2: Documentation Requirements). The EDGE User Guide further clarifies: "For glazing measures, post-construction evidence must confirm the installed product’s performance through manufacturer’s data sheets, ensuring alignment with the design-stage claims" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.1: Insulation Measures). Thus, manufacturer’s data sheets (Option C) are required at the post-construction stage.

The EDGE software estimates water use in homes by considering elements that contribute to potable water demand, focusing on indoor and occupant-related usage. The EDGE User Guide details the elements included in water use calculations: "In EDGE, water use in homes is estimated based on occupant activities, including water for showers, faucets, toilets, laundry, and water heating, which accounts for hot water demand in these applications. These elements are modeled using standard usage assumptions for residential buildings" (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures). Option B, water heating, is explicitly included, as it represents the hot water demand for showers, faucets, and laundry, which is a significant component of residential water use. Option A (HVAC) is incorrect, as HVAC systems primarily consume energy, not water, except in specific cases like cooling towers, which are not typical in homes: "HVAC systems in homes, such as air conditioners, do not directly contribute to water use in EDGE calculations, unlike in commercial buildings with cooling towers" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations). Option C (exterior fountains) is also excluded, as EDGE focuses on indoor water use: "Exterior water use, such as for fountains or irrigation, is not typically included in EDGE’s water use estimates for homes, unless specifically modeled as an optional measure, which fountains are not" (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.3: Additional Water Efficiency Measures). Option D (solar water heaters) is a measure to reduce energy use for water heating, not an element of water use itself: "Solar water heaters reduce the energy demand for water heating but do not change the volume of water used, which is what EDGE estimates for water use in homes" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). The EDGE Methodology Report further specifies: "Water use in homes is calculated based on per-capita assumptions for activities like showering, flushing, and water heating, ensuring a standardized baseline for savings calculations" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations). Thus, water heating (Option B) is the element considered in EDGE to estimate water use in homes.

The EDGE measure EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas focuses on reducing energy consumption through the use of efficient lighting. The EDGE User Guide specifies the requirements for this measure: "To claim EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas, at least 90% of the lamps in internal areas must be energy-efficient, such as LED or CFL, with a luminous efficacy of at least 80 lumens per watt. This threshold ensures significant energy savings while allowing for minimal exceptions in specific areas" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option C, 90%, directly matches this requirement. Option A (70%) and Option B (80%) are below the threshold, thus not qualifying for the measure. Option D (100%) exceeds the minimum requirement, but EDGE allows for flexibility with a 90% threshold to accommodate practical constraints: "A 90% requirement balances practicality with energy savings, recognizing that some areas may require specialized lighting" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Therefore, the minimum percentage to claim EEM22 is 90% (Option C).

EDGE Auditors must adhere to strict ethical guidelines to maintain independence and avoid conflicts of interest, particularly regarding payment structures that could influence their impartiality. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols address payment terms explicitly: "An EDGE Auditor must confirm a fixed fee for their services that is independent of the final assessment result. Payment structures that tie fees to the success of certification, such as contingent payments, are prohibited to ensure the Auditor’s objectivity and to prevent any perception of bias in the audit process" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). The client’s offer of 50% payment for assessment and 50% upon successful certification violates this principle, as it makes part of the fee contingent on the outcome. Option A, confirm a fixed fee independent of the final assessment result, aligns with this ethical requirement, ensuring the Auditor’s impartiality. Option B (lodge a complaint with local authorities) is incorrect, as this is an overreaction and outside the Auditor’s role: "Issues related to payment terms should be resolved directly with the Client, not escalated to local authorities, which are unrelated to EDGE certification" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process). Option C (refer the developer to another Auditor) avoids the issue but does not address the ethical concern: "Referring the Client to another Auditor does not resolve the ethical violation of contingent fees, which applies to all Auditors" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option D (accept the terms) is unethical, as it compromises the Auditor’s independence: "Accepting payment terms tied to certification success, even if the project is likely to succeed, violates EDGE protocols and undermines the integrity of the certification process" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). The EDGE User Guide further emphasizes: "Auditors must maintain strict independence, ensuring their compensation is not influenced by the certification outcome, to uphold the credibility of EDGE certification" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.5: Working with EDGE Auditors). Thus, the Auditor should confirm a fixed fee (Option A).

The role of the EDGE Auditor in the certification process is strictly defined to ensure independence and objectivity. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols state: "The EDGE Auditor’s primary role in the certification process is to conduct an independent audit of the project’s self-assessment and supporting documentation, providing a recommendation for certification to the Certification Provider based on compliance with EDGE standards" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option C, recommendation for certification, aligns with this responsibility. Option A (building design services) and Option D (recommendation of materials and building systems) are incorrect, as these are roles of the EDGE Expert or design team, not the Auditor: "Auditors do not provide design services or recommend materials; their role is to verify, not advise" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option B (approval of the building design) is also incorrect, as Auditors do not approve designs but assess compliance: "Final approval of certification is granted by the Certification Provider, not the Auditor" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Thus, the Auditor provides a recommendation for certification (Option C).

Pool covers are a water and energy efficiency measure in EDGE, particularly relevant for hotels with swimming pools. The EDGE User Guide outlines their benefits: "Pool covers reduce water demand by minimizing evaporation and energy demand by reducing the need for heating, as they retain heat in the pool. In EDGE, the use of pool covers is recognized for its dual impact on reducing both water and energy consumption" (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.3: Additional Water Efficiency Measures). Option B, reduce both water and energy demand, directly aligns with this description. Option A (increase solar control and comfort) is incorrect, as pool covers are not recognized in EDGE for solar control or occupant comfort but for resource savings. Option C (require less maintenance and work from employees) and Option D (reduce chemical consumption and that of cleaning products) are potential secondary benefits but are not quantified or recognized in EDGE calculations, as confirmed by: "EDGE focuses on measurable water and energy savings from pool covers, not on maintenance or chemical use reductions" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.3: Water Efficiency Calculations). Thus, Option B is the correct answer.

The EDGE software requires users to select a building type (typology) to model resource consumption accurately, and the choice depends on the scope of the certification. In this scenario, a tenant on the third floor (an office floor) of a medium-rise building seeks EDGE certification. The EDGE User Guide provides guidance on selecting building types for tenant spaces: "When a tenant within a larger building seeks EDGE certification, the building type should reflect the tenant’s space. For an office tenant on the third floor of a mixed-use building, the ‘Office’ typology should be selected, as the certification applies only to the tenant’s space, not the entire building, unless the whole building is being certified" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option A, Office, aligns with this guidance, as the tenant’s space is an office. Option B (Retail) is incorrect, as the retail floors are on the first two levels, not the third: "Retail typology would apply if the tenant space were on the retail floors, not the office floors" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option C (Mixed-use) is also incorrect, as this typology applies to the entire building, not a single tenant space: "Mixed-use typology is used when the entire building, including all uses (e.g., retail and offices), is being certified, not for individual tenant spaces" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 2.1: Calculation Approach). Option D (Core and Shell) is typically used for buildings certified up to the core and shell stage, not for tenant fit-outs: "Core and Shell typology applies to buildings certified without tenant fit-outs, focusing on the building envelope and systems, not individual tenant spaces like an office" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Standard). The EDGE User Guide further clarifies: "For tenant-led certifications, the typology should match the tenant’s use—e.g., ‘Office’ for an office tenant—even if the building has multiple uses, ensuring the Base Case reflects the tenant’s specific consumption patterns” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Since the tenant on the third floor operates an office, the Office typology (Option A) is the correct choice for EDGE certification.

The EDGE methodology quantifies the impact of water efficiency measures like rainwater harvesting and recycled water by comparing the Improved Case to the Base Case. The EDGE Methodology Report states: "Recycled water or rainwater harvested on site reduces the building’s potable water demand in the Improved Case. This reduction is deducted from the Improved Case water consumption and reported as water savings in the EDGE software, reflecting the volume of potable water no longer required due to the measure" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations). Option B, water savings, accurately reflects this reporting method, as the software highlights the reduction in potable water use as a saving. Option A (water usage) is incorrect, as this term refers to the total consumption, not the reduction: "Water usage in EDGE refers to the total volume consumed, not the savings achieved" (EDGE User Guide, Glossary). Option C (wastewater) is unrelated, as it refers to water output, not savings: "Wastewater is water discharged from the building, not a savings metric" (EDGE User Guide, Glossary). Option D (potable water) is also incorrect, as the measure reduces potable water use, but the reported metric is the saving, not the potable water itself: "Potable water demand is an input, while savings are the output" (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures). Thus, the correct reporting is water savings (Option B).

The EDGE Standard defines specific project types eligible for certification levels, including EDGE Advanced, which requires at least 40% energy savings. The EDGE Certification Protocol specifies: "EDGE Advanced certification is available for new constructions that achieve a minimum of 40% energy savings compared to the base case, applicable to building typologies such as homes, hotels, offices, hospitals, retail, and schools" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.3: Certification Levels). Option A, new constructions, aligns with this scope, as EDGE focuses on new buildings across supported typologies. Option B, green lease agreements, is not a building type and is outside EDGE’s certification framework. Option C, infrastructure constructions, and Option D, parks and landscape projects, are also not covered under EDGE typologies, as confirmed by the EDGE User Guide: "EDGE certification applies to new buildings and major renovations of specific typologies, excluding infrastructure or landscape-only projects" (EDGE User Guide, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Certification). Thus, only new constructions qualify for EDGE Advanced certification.

The EDGE Auditor’s submission for Preliminary Certification (design stage) must include specific elements to support the recommendation for certification. The EDGE Certification Protocol specifies: "For Preliminary Certification, the EDGE Auditor’s submission must include compliance documents for the selected measures, such as drawings, specifications, and manufacturer’s data sheets, which verify that the design aligns with the self-assessment in the EDGE software. These documents are reviewed by the Certification Provider to confirm eligibility" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option C, compliance documents for selected measures, directly matches this requirement. Option A (all available design data) is too broad and not required: "Only documents directly related to the selected measures are needed, not all design data" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option B (Chapter 5 EDGE certification protocol) is incorrect, as this refers to the protocol document itself, not a submission component: "The certification protocol is a reference, not part of the Auditor’s submission" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.1: Overview). Option D (design audit site visit results) is incorrect, as site visits are not required at the design stage: "Preliminary Certification is based on a desk audit, not a site visit, which occurs at the post-construction stage" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). Thus, compliance documents (Option C) are required in the submission.

In the EDGE software, the "most attractive solution" for a project, such as a hospital, is determined by balancing resource savings (energy, water, or materials) with financial payback periods, as these metrics are key outputs in the EDGE App Results Bar. The EDGE User Guide explains how to evaluate measures: "The EDGE software prioritizes measures that offer the highest resource savings with the shortest payback periods, making them the most attractive solutions for project teams. For hospitals, where energy and water demands are high due to continuous operation, measures with significant savings and faster payback are typically preferred" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results). Let’s evaluate the options: Option A (external shading) offers 7% savings (likely energy, as shading reduces cooling loads) with an 8-year payback. Option B (insulation of external walls) provides 3% savings (also energy) with a 9-year payback. Option C (solar hot water system) delivers 15% savings (energy, as it reduces the need for electric or gas water heating) with a 6-year payback. Option D (water-cooled chillers) achieves 20% energy savings but with a 10-year payback. The EDGE Methodology Report further clarifies: "For hospitals, measures like solar hot water systems are often attractive because they address high hot water demands (e.g., for sterilization, showers), offering substantial energy savings with relatively short payback periods due to consistent usage" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.3: Energy Measures). Comparing the options, Option C has the second-highest savings (15%) and the shortest payback (6 years), making it more attractive than Option D (20% savings but 10 years payback), Option A (7% savings, 8 years), and Option B (3% savings, 9 years). The EDGE User Guide also notes: "A payback period of 6 years is generally considered attractive in EDGE, especially for measures with savings above 10%, as it aligns with typical investment horizons for building owners" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results). Additionally, for a hospital, hot water demand is significant, making solar hot water systems particularly effective: "Hospitals benefit greatly from solar hot water systems, achieving energy savings of 10-20% with payback periods often under 7 years due to high hot water usage" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Energy Savings Calculations). Thus, the solar hot water system (Option C) is the most attractive solution due to its balanced savings and shortest payback period.

Insulation materials in EDGE are evaluated for their thermal performance and embodied energy as part of materials efficiency measures. The EDGE User Guide lists common insulation options: "In EDGE, insulation materials for walls, roofs, and floors include mineral wool, polyurethane,polystyrene, and fiberglass, which are selected for their low thermal conductivity and availability in most markets" (EDGE User Guide, Section 7.2: Materials Efficiency Measures). Options A (mineral wool), B (polyurethane), and D (polystyrene) are explicitly mentioned as insulation materials in EDGE. Option C, polypropylene, is not listed as an insulation material, as confirmed by the EDGE Methodology Report: "Polypropylene is a plastic material often used in packaging or pipes, but it is not recognized in EDGE as an insulation material due to its poor thermal resistance compared to standard insulation options like polystyrene or polyurethane" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 6.1: Embodied Energy in Materials). The EDGE software’s material database further excludes polypropylene from insulation options, focusing instead on materials with established thermal properties for building envelopes. Thus, polypropylene (Option C) is not an insulation option in EDGE.

Adoption of green building practices in EDGE is influenced by factors that incentivize or mandate resource efficiency. The EDGE User Guide discusses drivers for green building adoption: "Factors that lead to higher adoption of green building practices include green building regulations, which mandate compliance with efficiency standards; public awareness and capacity building, which educate stakeholders on the benefits of green design; and clear visibility of estimated savings and costs, which provide financial justification for green measures" (EDGE User Guide, Section 1.1: Introduction to EDGE). Option A (green building regulations) directly encourages adoption by enforcing standards: "Regulations requiring energy or water efficiency standards push developers to adopt green practices to meet legal requirements" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Standard). Option C (public awareness and capacity building) increases adoption by educating stakeholders: "Awareness campaigns and training programs increase demand for greenbuildings by informing developers, owners, and tenants of their benefits" (EDGE User Guide, Section 1.1: Introduction to EDGE). Option D (clear visibility of estimated savings and costs) incentivizes adoption by demonstrating financial benefits: "EDGE’s display of savings and payback periods motivates adoption by showing the return on investment for green measures" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results). However, Option B (lower electricity supply costs) may not lead to higher adoption, as it reduces the financial incentive to save energy: "Lower electricity supply costs decrease the cost savings from energy efficiency measures, potentially discouraging investment in green practices, as the payback period for measures like insulation or efficient lighting becomes longer" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.4: Cost Savings Calculations). The EDGE User Guide further elaborates: "High utility costs often drive green building adoption by making energy and water savings more financially attractive, whereas lower costs can reduce the urgency to implement efficiency measures" (EDGE User Guide, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Certification). In this context, lower electricity supply costs (Option B) may not encourage green building practices, as the economic motivation for energy savings diminishes.

EDGE Auditors must meet specific requirements to maintain their licensed status, ensuring they remain active and competent in their role. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols provide detailed guidance: "To maintain their licensed status, EDGE Auditors must undertake at least one building project audit every two years. This requirement ensures that Auditors remain actively engaged in the certification process and maintain their practical experience in verifying EDGE projects" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.1: Maintaining Auditor Status). Option A, undertake at least one building project audit every two years, directly aligns with this requirement. Option B (attend refresher training for at least two hours every two years) and Option C (attend refresher training for at least two hours every three years) are incorrect, as the protocols specify a different training requirement: "EDGE Auditors must attend refresher training as required by IFC, typically every three years, but the duration is not specified as a minimum of two hours; the focus is on completing the training, not the exact hours" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.1: Maintaining Auditor Status). Option D (undertake at least one building project audit every three years) is also incorrect, as the required frequency is every two years, not three: "A three-year interval for audits does not meet the requirement of one audit every two years, which is necessary to ensure ongoing competence" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.1: Maintaining Auditor Status). The EDGE User Guide supports this by stating: "Auditors maintain their status by conducting at least one audit every two years, ensuring they stay familiar with EDGE standards and procedures through active practice" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.5: Working with EDGE Auditors). Additionally, the protocols note: "Failure to conduct an audit within two years may result in a lapse of Auditor status, requiring recertification through additional training or re-examination" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.2: Recertification Conditions). Thus, undertaking at least one audit every two years (Option A) is the correct requirement for maintaining EDGE Auditor status.

The EDGE framework strictly enforces separation of roles to maintain integrity and avoid conflicts of interest during the certification process. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols explicitly address this issue: "An individual cannot serve as both the EDGE Expert and EDGE Auditor on the same project. This separation ensures independence in the audit process, as the Expert’s role as a consultant advising the project team could bias the Auditor’s objective assessment of the project’s compliance with EDGE standards" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option A, no, an EDGE Expert cannot be the EDGE Auditor on the same project, directly reflects this rule. Option B (no, even if the Certifier agrees to special terms) adds an unnecessary condition, as the protocols do not allow exceptions: "No exceptions are permitted for an individualto serve in both roles on the same project, regardless of agreements or special terms" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option C (yes, in all cases) is incorrect, as it contradicts the conflict-of-interest rules: "Allowing dual roles in all cases would undermine the impartiality required for certification" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Option D (yes, if no other Auditors are available) is also incorrect, as availability does not override the conflict-of-interest prohibition: "Even if no other Auditors are available, the roles must remain separate; the Client must find a different Auditor or delay the audit" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process). The EDGE User Guide reinforces this principle: "The separation of Expert and Auditor roles ensures a fair and unbiased certification process, protecting the credibility of EDGE certification" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.4: Working with EDGE Experts). Thus, it is not possible to be both (Option A).

EDGE Zero Carbon certification requires periodic renewal to ensure ongoing compliance with zero carbon standards, particularly since it often involves carbon offsets or renewable energy commitments that may change over time. The EDGE Certification Protocol specifies the renewal timeline: "EDGE Zero Carbon certification must be renewed initially after two years to verify that the building continues to meet the zero carbon requirements, including the use of carbon offsets or renewable energy. Subsequently, renewal is required every four years to ensure long-term compliance with the standard" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.3: Certification Levels). Option A, initially after two years, subsequently every four years, directly matches this requirement.Option B (initially after four years, subsequently every two years) reverses the timeline, which does not align with the protocol: "The initial two-year renewal ensures early verification, while the four-year cycle applies thereafter to balance monitoring with practicality" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.3: Certification Levels). Option C (every two years if using carbon offsets, or every four years if using 100% renewable energy) and Option D (every four years if using carbon offsets, or every two years if using 100% renewable energy) introduce a distinction based on the method of achieving zero carbon status, which is not supported by EDGE documentation: "The renewal timeline for EDGE Zero Carbon is consistent regardless of whether carbon offsets or renewable energy are used, as both methods require ongoing verification of performance and offset purchases" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.3: Advanced Certifications). The EDGE Methodology Report adds: "The two-year initial renewal allows for confirmation of operational data and offset validity, while the four-year subsequent renewal cycle ensures sustained commitment without excessive administrative burden" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 2.3: Zero Carbon Calculations). The EDGE User Guide further confirms: "EDGE Zero Carbon certification renewal follows a standard schedule of two years initially, then every four years, to maintain the integrity of the zero carbon claim over time" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.3: Advanced Certifications). Thus, the correct renewal schedule is initially after two years, then every four years (Option A).

The EDGE framework strictly prohibits Auditors from engaging in roles that could compromise their independence, such as providing design consultancy on the same project they are auditing. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols address this scenario explicitly: "An EDGE Auditor must not accept any role in the design development of a project they are auditing, as this creates a conflict of interest by blurring the lines between consultancy and independent verification. If the Client requests the Auditor to take on a design role, the Auditor should decline and may refer the Client to another qualified professional who is not involved in the audit process" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option B, refer the Client to an associate within the organization who works in another department, but is qualified and available to carry out the work, aligns with this guidance, as it maintains the Auditor’s independence while helping the Client find a suitable replacement. Option A (resign from the audit role) is an overreaction, as the request itself does not compromise the Auditor’s position unless accepted: "The Auditor is not required to resign unless they have already engaged in a conflicting role, which can be avoided by declining the request" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process). Option C (accept the additional commission) is unethical, as it violates conflict-of-interest rules: "Accepting a design role on a project being audited undermines the Auditor’s impartiality, as they would be auditing theirown work, which is strictly prohibited" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Option D (refer the Client to an associate working with the Auditor on the EDGE audit) is also incorrect, as this associate is already involved in the audit, creating a potential conflict: "Referring the Client to someone involved in the same audit does not resolve the conflict of interest, as the audit team must remain independent from design activities" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). The EDGE User Guide reinforces this principle: "Auditors must maintain strict separation from design roles to ensure an unbiased audit, and should assist the Client by referring them to independent professionals if needed" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.5: Working with EDGE Auditors). Thus, referring the Client to a qualified associate in another department (Option B) is the correct action.

The EDGE certification process assigns clear responsibilities to various stakeholders to ensure a smooth and accountable process. The EDGE Certification Protocol defines the role of the ProjectOwner (also referred to as the EDGE Client): "The Project Owner, as the EDGE Client, is responsible for the entire project within the EDGE certification system. This includes providing all necessary project documentation (e.g., drawings, specifications, and self-assessments), ensuring access to the site for audits, and paying the audit and certification fees as required by the Certification Provider" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.1: Roles and Responsibilities). Option C, Project Owner, directly aligns with this comprehensive responsibility. Option A (EDGE Expert) is incorrect, as the Expert’s role is advisory: "The EDGE Expert provides consultancy services, assisting with documentation and measure selection, but the ultimate responsibility for submission and payment lies with the Project Owner" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert). Option B (EDGE Auditor) is also incorrect, as the Auditor’s role is to verify compliance, not manage the project: "The EDGE Auditor conducts independent audits and is not responsible for project management, documentation provision, or fee payments" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option D (EDGE Certification Provider) is responsible for issuing certificates and overseeing the process, not managing the project: "The EDGE Certification Provider, such as GBCI, reviews the Auditor’s recommendation and issues certificates, but does not manage the project or pay fees" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). The EDGE User Guide further reinforces this: "The Project Owner must coordinate all aspects of the certification process, ensuring documentation is complete, site access is granted for post-construction audits, and all fees are paid to the Certification Provider in a timely manner" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.1: Project Preparation). This holistic responsibility makes the Project Owner (Option C) the correct answer.

In EDGE, the Coefficient of Performance (COP) is used to measure the efficiency of heating systems that produce heat using a refrigeration cycle, such as heat pumps. The EDGE Methodology Report specifies: "The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is used in EDGE to evaluate the efficiency of heat pumps, including ground source heat pumps, where it is defined as the ratio of thermal output to electrical input. This metric is not applied to direct heating systems like electric heaters or boilers" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Option C, ground source heat pump, fits this description as it operates using a refrigeration cycle to transfer heat, and its efficiency is measured by COP in EDGE. Option A (electric heater) has an efficiency typically measured as 100% (or COP of 1), but EDGE does not use COP for such systems, as noted: "Electric heaters are assumed to have a fixed efficiency in EDGE, not evaluated via COP" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). Option B (condensing boiler) uses thermal efficiency (%), not COP, as per: "Boilers in EDGE are assessed by their thermal efficiency, not COP" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Heating Systems). Option D (sensible heat recovery from exhaust air) is a heat recovery method, not a heating system, and does not use COP: "Heat recovery systems are evaluated by their heat recovery effectiveness, not COP" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.3: Ventilation Measures). Thus, ground source heat pump (Option C) is the correct choice.