CMMC-CCP Sample Questions Answers

Final Interpretation Authority in the CMMC Assessment ProcessDuring aCMMC Level 2 assessment, several entities are involved in the process, including theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC), Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO), Assessment Team Members, and the CMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB).

Role of the C3PAO and Assessment Team:

TheCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)is responsible for conducting the assessment and makinginitial recommended findingsbased on NIST SP 800-171 security requirements.

Assessment Team Members(Lead Assessor and support staff) conduct evaluations and submit theirrecommendationsto the C3PAO.

Final Interpretation Authority – CMMC-AB:

TheCMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB)is responsible for ensuring consistency and accuracy in assessments.

If there is any dispute or need for clarification regarding findings, CMMC-AB provides the final interpretation and guidance.

This ensures uniformity in certification decisions across different C3PAOs.

Why CMMC-AB is the Correct Answer:

CMMC-AB has the ultimate authority over thequality assurance processfor assessments.

It reviewsremediation requests, challenges, or disputesfrom the OSC or C3PAO and makes final determinations.

The CMMC-AB maintains oversight to ensure assessmentsalign with CMMC 2.0 policies and DFARS 252.204-7021 requirements.

A. C3PAO– The C3PAO conducts the assessment and submits findings, butit does not have the final interpretation authority. Findings must pass through theCMMC-AB quality assurance process.

C. OSC Sponsor– The OSC (Organization Seeking Certification)cannot interpret findings; they can only respond to identified deficiencies and appeal assessments through CMMC-AB channels.

D. Assessment Team Members– The assessment teamrecommends findingsbut does not make final interpretations. Their role is limited to conducting evaluations, collecting evidence, and submitting reports to the C3PAO.

Understanding Training Requirements in CMMCThe requirement for ensuring thatpersonnel are trained to carry out their assigned information security-related duties and responsibilitiesfirst appears inCMMC Level 2as part ofNIST SP 800-171 control AT.L2-3.2.1.

Key Details on the Training Requirement:✔AT.L2-3.2.1: "Ensure that personnel are trained to carry out their assigned information security-related duties and responsibilities."

✔This control is derived fromNIST SP 800-171and applies toCMMC Level 2 (Advanced).

✔It ensures that employees handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)understand theircybersecurity responsibilities.

A. Level 1 → Incorrect

CMMC Level 1 does not include this training requirement.Level 1 focuses on basic safeguarding ofFederal Contract Information (FCI)but doesnot require formal cybersecurity training.

B. Level 2 → Correct

The training requirement (AT.L2-3.2.1) first appears in CMMC Level 2, which aligns withNIST SP 800-171.

C. Level 3 → Incorrect

The training requirementalready exists in Level 2. Level 3 builds on Level 2 with additionalrisk management and advanced cybersecurity controls, but training is introduced at Level 2.

D. All levels → Incorrect

CMMC Level 1 does not include this requirement—it is first introduced in Level 2.

Why is the Correct Answer "B. Level 2"?

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.2.1)

Defines themandatory training requirementfor personnel handling CUI.

CMMC Assessment Guide for Level 2

ListsAT.L2-3.2.1as a required practice under Level 2.

CMMC 2.0 Model Overview

Confirms thatCMMC Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171, which includes security training requirements.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Step 1: Understand the “CA” Domain – Security AssessmentTheCA (Security Assessment)domain includes practices related to:

Planning security assessments,

Performing periodic reviews,

Managing plans of action and milestones (POA&Ms).

These practices derive fromNIST SP 800-171, specifically:

CA.2.157– Develop, document, and periodically update security plans,

CA.2.158– Periodically assess security controls,

CA.2.159– Develop and implement POA&Ms.

Level 1 (Foundational):

Implements only the17 practicesfromFAR 52.204-21

Doesnot include the CA domain

Level 2 (Advanced):

Implements110 practicesfromNIST SP 800-171, including CA.2.157–159

First levelwhereSecurity Assessment (CA)practices are required

Level 3:

Not yet finalized but intended to include selected controls fromNIST SP 800-172

✅Step 2: Review CMMC Levels

A. Level 1✘ No CA domain practices are present at Level 1.

C. Level 3 / D. Level 4✘ These levels build on CA practices but do not represent thestarting point.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

TheSecurity Assessment (CA)domain practices begin atCMMC Level 2, as part of the implementation ofNIST SP 800-171.

TheU.S. Department of Defense (DoD)is the entity thatrequiresorganizations handlingFederal Contract Information (FCI)orControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)to undergo an assessment to determine their required level ofcybersecurity maturityunderCMMC 2.0.

This requirement stems from theDFARS 252.204-7021 clause, which mandates CMMC certification for contractors handling FCI or CUI.

In the context of a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 Assessment, specific practices must be evaluated to ensure compliance with established security requirements. One such practice is AC.L2-3.1.19, which mandates the encryption of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Requirement Overview:

Practice AC.L2-3.1.19 requires organizations to "Encrypt CUI on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms." This ensures that any CUI accessed, stored, or transmitted via mobile devices is protected through encryption, mitigating risks associated with data breaches or unauthorized access.

Assessment of Provided Evidence:

During the assessment, the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) provided an inventory list encompassing servers, workstations, and network devices. Notably, this list lacks any mention of mobile devices or mobile computing platforms.

Implications of the Omission:

The absence of mobile devices in the inventory suggests that the OSC may not have accounted for all assets that process, store, or transmit CUI. Without a comprehensive inventory that includes mobile devices, it's challenging to verify whether the OSC has implemented the necessary encryption measures for CUI on these platforms.

Assessment Determination:

Given the incomplete inventory, the evidence is insufficient to make a definitive scoring determination for practice AC.L2-3.1.19. The OSC must provide a detailed inventory that encompasses all relevant devices, including mobile devices and computing platforms, to demonstrate compliance with the encryption requirements for CUI.

TheCMMC Model consists of 14 domains, which are based on theNIST SP 800-171 control familieswith additional cybersecurity practices.

Eachdomaincontainspractices and processesthat define cybersecurity requirements for organizations seeking CMMC certification.

Understanding SI.L1-3.14.2: Provide Protection from Malicious CodeThe CMMC Level 1 practiceSI.L1-3.14.2is based onNIST SP 800-171 Requirement 3.14.2, which requires organizations to:

Implement malicious code protection(e.g., antivirus, endpoint security software).

Ensure coverage across all appropriate locations(e.g., workstations, servers, network entry points).

Keep protection mechanisms updated(e.g., regular signature updates, policy enforcement).

Assessment Criteria for a "MET" Rating:To determine whether the practice isMET, the Lead Assessor must confirm that:

✔Antivirus or endpoint protection software is installedon all workstations and servers.

✔The solution is centrally managed, ensuring consistent policy enforcement.

✔Signature updates are current, meaning systems are protected against new threats.

✔Logs or reports demonstrate active monitoring and updates.

Why is the Correct Answer "A. It is sufficient, and the audit finding can be rated as MET"?The provided evidenceconfirms all necessary requirementsfor SI.L1-3.14.2:

✔All workstations and servers have antivirus installed→Meets installation requirement.

✔A centralized management console is in place→Ensures consistent enforcement.

✔Records show antivirus signatures are up to date→Confirms system protection is current.

Because the evidencemeets the requirement, the practice should berated as MET.

B. It is insufficient, and the audit finding can be rated NOT MET → Incorrect

The evidence providedmeets all necessary requirements, so the practiceshould not be rated as NOT MET.

C. It is sufficient, and the Lead Assessor should seek more evidence → Incorrect

Ifadequate evidence already exists,additional evidence is unnecessary.

D. It is insufficient, and the Lead Assessor should seek more evidence → Incorrect

The evidence providedmeets the control requirements, making itsufficient.

Why Are the Other Answers Incorrect?

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that a practice can be marked asMET if sufficient evidence is provided.

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.14.2)

Defines the standard formalicious code protection, which ismet by antivirus with active updates.

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 (Foundational) Requirements

Clarifies that basic cybersecurity measures likeantivirus installation and updatesmeet compliance forSI.L1-3.14.2.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Final Answer:✔A. It is sufficient, and the audit finding can be rated as MET.

Understanding CMMC Asset CategorizationTheCMMC 2.0 Scoping Guidedefines how assets are categorized based on their involvement withFederal Contract Information (FCI)andControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

In this scenario:

Thegovernment services divisioninteracts withfederal clientsandreceives FCI, making its assetsin-scopefor CMMC Level 1.

Thecommercial services divisioninteractsonly with non-federal clientsanddoes not handle FCI—this means its assets arenot subject to CMMC Level 1 requirementsand should be classified asOut-of-Scope Assets.

CMMC 2.0 Definition of Out-of-Scope AssetsAs per theCMMC Scoping Guide, assets that:

✅Do not store, process, or transmit FCI/CUI

✅Do not directly impact the security of in-scope assets

✅Are completely segregated from the FCI/CUI environment

are classified asOut-of-Scope Assets.

Since thecommercial services divisiononly processespublicly available information and has no interaction with FCI, its assets areout-of-scopefor CMMC Level 1 assessment.

A. FCI Assets❌Incorrect. FCI assets areonly those that store, process, or transmit FCI. The commercial services division doesnothandle FCI, so its assets donotqualify.

B. Specialized Assets❌Incorrect. Specialized assets refer toInternet of Things (IoT), Operational Technology (OT), and test equipment. These donot applyto a general commercial services division.

D. Operational Technology Assets❌Incorrect.Operational Technology (OT) Assetsinvolveindustrial control systems, SCADA, and manufacturing equipment—which are not relevant to this scenario.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC 2.0 Scoping Guide – Level 1 & Level 2

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option C (Out-of-Scope Assets) is the correct answerbased on official CMMC scoping guidance.

What Does "CUI//SP-PRVCY//FED Only" Mean?

The email containsControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)withspecific categories and dissemination controls.

CUI//SP-PRVCY//FED Onlybreaks down as follows:

CUI→ Controlled Unclassified Information designation.

SP-PRVCY→Specifiedcategory forPrivacy Information(SP stands for "Specified").

FED Only→ Restriction forFederal Government use only(not for contractors or the public).

Who Maintains the Official CUI Registry?

TheNational Archives and Records Administration (NARA) oversees the CUI Programand maintains the officialCUI Registry(https://www.archives.gov/cui).

The CUI Registry providesdefinitions, marking guidance, and categoriesfor all CUI labels, including "SP-PRVCY" and dissemination controls like "FED Only."

Why NARA is the Correct Answer:

NARA is the governing body responsible for defining and managing CUI markings.

Any organization handling CUI shouldrefer to the NARA CUI Registryfor official marking interpretations.

DoD contractors and other organizationsmust comply with NARA guidelines when handling, marking, and disseminating CUI.

B. CMMC-AB– TheCMMC Accreditation Bodymanages certification assessments butdoes not define or interpret CUI markings.

C. DoD Contractors FAQ Page– The DoD may provide general contractor guidance, butCUI markings are governed by NARA, not an FAQ page.

D. DoD 239.7601 Definitions Page– This refers to generalDoD acquisition definitions, butCUI categories and markings fall under NARA’s authority.

Understanding the Final Review Process in a CMMC AssessmentDuring aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theAssessment Teamand theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)holddaily checkpoint meetingsto discuss progress, review evidence, and ensure transparency.

At theend of the assessment, afinal review meetingis conducted, during which theLead Assessor presents the results. Therecorded Daily Checkpoint logserves as theofficial document summarizing:

Theattendee list

Time, date, and locationof the final review

Final MET or NOT MET ratingsfor all practices

Discussion points, resulting actions, and due datesfor both the OSC and Assessment Team

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guidespecifies that all assessment findings and discussions must bedocumented throughout the assessment in daily checkpoint logs.

TheFinal and Recorded Daily Checkpoint Logincludes all necessary details, such as attendee lists, discussion topics, and action items.

This document isused to ensure all discussed topics and agreed-upon actions are properly tracked and recordedbefore submission.

A. Final log report (Incorrect)

There isno specific "Final Log Report"required in CMMC assessments.

B. Final CMMC report (Incorrect)

TheFinal CMMC Reportdocuments the overall assessment results butdoes not serve as the official meeting logfor the final review discussion.

C. Final and recorded OSC CMMC report (Incorrect)

This documentdoes not include detailed discussion points from the daily checkpoint meetings.

The correct answer isD. Final and recorded Daily Checkpoint log, as this is the official document that captures thefinal meeting details, discussions, and action items.

ACMMC Level 2 Assessmentis conducted by aC3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization)to determine whether theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)meets all required110 NIST SP 800-171 controls.

Before submitting the results, theC3PAO must complete a final briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSCto review findings and clarify any concerns.

A. Pay an assessment submission fee→Incorrect

There is no mandatory submission fee for assessment results.Fees apply to the assessment process, not submission.

B. Complete an internal review of the results→Incorrect

While internal reviews are encouraged, they arenot a required step before submissionin CMMC assessment procedures.

C. Notify the CMMC-AB that submission is forthcoming→Incorrect

TheC3PAO submits results to the CMMC-AB through the CMMC eMASS system, but prior notification isnot a required procedural step.

D. Coordinate a final briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSC→Correct

According toCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) guidelines, theLead Assessor must conduct a final briefing with the OSCbefore submitting the results.

This briefing ensures transparency, provides OSC with insight into the findings, and allows for final clarifications.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0

Requires afinal briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSC before submitting assessment results.

CMMC-AB and C3PAO Process Requirements

TheLead Assessor must communicate final findings with the OSC before submission to CMMC-AB.

Analysis of the Given Options:Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:Conclusion:The correct answer is:

✅D. Coordinate a final briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSC.

Step 1: Understand the Assessor’s Role and Chain of ResponsibilityDuring a CMMC assessment, the assessor ispart of the team organized by a C3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization). If the assessor determines thatevidence is insufficient or inadequate, they arenot authorizedto act independently in terms of halting or postponing the assessment.

Source Reference: CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0 – Section 3.5.4 & 3.5.6

"If the Assessment Team identifies gaps in the sufficiency or adequacy of evidence, they must work with the Lead Assessor and C3PAO to determine the appropriate course of action."

The C3PAO is responsible for overseeing the assessment lifecycle.

If evidence isnot adequate, the assessor mustescalate within their organization(i.e., to the Lead Assessor or C3PAO point of contact) to:

Request clarifications from the OSC,

Determine if additional evidence can be requested,

Decide on continuing, pausing, or modifying the assessment schedule.

✅Step 2: Why Contacting the C3PAO Is the Correct Action

A. Notify the CMMC-AB✘ Incorrect. The Cyber AB (formerly CMMC-AB) isnot involved in operational aspectsof assessments. They do not manage day-to-day assessment decisions.

B. Cancel the assessment✘ Incorrect. An assessorcannot unilaterally cancelan assessment. Only theC3PAO, in consultation with all parties, may take such action.

C. Postpone the assessment✘ Incorrect. Postponements are logistical decisions that must be managed through theC3PAO, not an individual assessor.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

When an assessor determines that the evidence submitted by an OSC is inadequate or insufficient to meet a CMMC practice, thecorrect and required course of action is to consult with the C3PAO. The C3PAO will provide guidance or coordinate appropriate next steps.

In theCMMC 2.0 Assessment Process, after theAssessment Final Recommended Findings Brief, theLead Assessor and Assessment Team Membersmustreview the accuracy and validity of the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC)’s updated Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) and any accompanying evidence or scheduled collectionswithin180 days.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)outlines that organizations haveup to 180 daysto address identifieddeficienciesafter their initial assessment.

During this time, the OSC can update itsPOA&M with additional evidenceto demonstrate compliance.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 Reference:

A. 90 days → Incorrect

The CMMC CAP does not impose a90-day limiton POA&M updates; instead,180 daysis the standard timeframe.

B. 180 days → Correct

PerCMMC Assessment Process guidelines, theLead Assessor and Teammust review updateswithin 180 days.

C. 270 days → Incorrect

No official CMMC documentation mentions a270-dayreview period.

D. 360 days → Incorrect

The process must be completedfar sooner than 360 daysto maintain compliance.

Why is the Correct Answer 180 Days (B)?

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Defines the180-day windowfor the OSC to update itsPOA&M and submit evidencefor review.

CMMC 2.0 Official Guidelines

Specifies that organizations are givenup to 180 daysto remediate deficiencies before reassessment.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

Understanding the “Verify Evidence and Record Gaps” Activity in a CMMC AssessmentDuring aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theAssessment Teamfollows a structured methodology toverify evidenceand determine whether theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)has met all required practices. One of the key activities in this process is"Verify Evidence and Record Gaps", which ensures that the assessment findings accurately reflect any missing or inadequate compliance evidence.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. Primary Intent: Identifying Gaps Between Required and Collected Evidence

TheAssessment Teamcompares the evidence provided by the OSC against theCMMC practice requirements.

If evidence ismissing, insufficient, or inconsistent, assessors mustdocument the gapand describe what is lacking.

This ensures that compliance deficiencies are clearly identified, allowing the OSC to understand what must be corrected.

✅2. How This Process Works in a CMMC Assessment

Assessorsreview collected documentation, system configurations, policies, and interview responses.

They verify that the evidencematches the expected implementationof a practice.

If gaps exist, they arerecordedfor discussion and potential remediation before assessment completion.

✅3. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Map test and demonstration responses to CMMC practices.❌

Incorrect:While mapping evidence to CMMC practices is part of the assessment, theprimary intentof the "Verify Evidence and Record Gaps" step is toidentify deficiencies, not just mapping responses.

(B) Conduct interviews to test process implementation knowledge.❌

Incorrect:Interviews are a method used during evidence collection, but they arenot the primary focusof the verification and gap analysis step.

(C) Determine the one-to-one relationship between a practice and an assessment object.❌

Incorrect:The assessment teamreviews multiple sources of evidencefor each practice, and some practices require multiple assessment objects. The goal isnot a strict one-to-one mappingbut rathera holistic validation of compliance.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:TheCMMC Assessment Process Guidestates that"Verify Evidence and Record Gaps"is the step where assessorscompare expected evidence against what has been provided and document discrepancies. This ensurestransparent assessment findings and remediation planning.

Thus, the correct answer is:

D. Identify and describe differences between what the Assessment Team required and the evidence collected.

TheRisk Assessment (RA) domainaligns withNIST SP 800-171 control family 3.11 (Risk Assessment)and is designed to help organizationsidentify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risksthat could impact their operations.

TheRA.3.144 practice(which is a CMMC Level 2 requirement) explicitly states:

"Periodically assess therisktoorganizational operations (including mission, functions, image, or reputation), organizational assets, and individualsresulting from the operation of organizational systems and the associated processing, storage, or transmission of CUI."

This means that OSCs (Organizations Seeking Certification) should regularly evaluate risks to:

✅Organizational operations(e.g., mission, business continuity, functions)

✅Organizational assets(e.g., data, IT systems, intellectual property)

✅Individuals(e.g., employees, contractors, customers affected by security risks)

Thus, the correct answer isC. Organizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals.

A. Organizational operations, business assets, and employees❌Incorrect."Business assets"is not the correct terminology used in CMMC/NIST SP 800-171. Instead,"organizational assets"is the proper term.

B. Organizational operations, business processes, and employees❌Incorrect."Business processes"is not a part of the formal risk assessment requirement. The correct scope includesorganizational assetsandindividuals, not just processes.

D. Organizational operations, organizational processes, and individuals❌Incorrect. While processes are important,organizational assetsmust be considered in the assessment, not just processes.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC 2.0 Model (Level 2 - RA.3.144)– Specifies that risk assessments must coverorganizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals.

NIST SP 800-171 (3.11.1)– Reinforces the same risk assessment scope.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option C (Organizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals) is the correct answerbased on official CMMC risk assessment requirements.

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) PhasesTheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)consists ofthree primary phases:

Phase 1 - Planning(Pre-assessment activities)

Phase 2 - Conducting the Assessment(Evidence collection and analysis)

Phase 3 - Reporting and Finalizing Results

DuringPhase 3, the Assessment Teamreviews evidenceto confirm if anyLimited Practice Deficiency Correctionshave been successfully implemented.

Scoring Practices in Phase 3The CAP document specifies that a practice can bescored as METif:

✅The deficiency identified in Phase 2 has been fully corrected before final scoring.

✅Sufficient evidence is provided to demonstrate compliance with the CMMC requirement.

✅The correction is notmerely plannedbutfully implemented and validatedby the assessors.

Since the evidence shows thatdeficiencies have been corrected, the correct score isMET.

B. POA&M (Plan of Action & Milestones)❌Incorrect. APOA&M (Plan of Action and Milestones)is usedonly when a deficiency remains unresolved. Since the deficiency is already corrected, this option does not apply.

C. NOT MET❌Incorrect. A practice is scoredNOT METonly if the deficiency hasnotbeen corrected by the end of the assessment.

D. NOT APPLICABLE❌Incorrect. A practice is markedNOT APPLICABLE (N/A)only if it doesnot apply to the organization’s environment, which is not the case here.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines scoring criteria for MET, NOT MET, and POA&M.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option A (MET) is the correct answer, as the deficiencies have been corrected before final scoring.

Understanding the "Examine" Assessment Method in CMMC 2.0CMMC 2.0 usesthree assessment methodsto evaluate security compliance:

Examine– Reviewing, inspecting, observing, studying, or analyzing assessment objects (e.g., policies, system documentation).

Interview– Speaking with personnel to verify knowledge and responsibilities.

Test– Performing technical validation to check system configurations.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)definesExamineas the method used toreview or analyze assessment objects, such as policies, procedures, configurations, and logs.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 Reference:

A. Test → Incorrect

"Test" involvesexecutinga function to validate its security (e.g., verifying access controls through a live system test).

B. Assess → Incorrect

"Assess" is a broad term; CMMC explicitly defines "Examine" as the method for reviewing documentation.

C. Examine → Correct

"Examine" is the official term forreviewing policies, procedures, configurations, or logs.

D. Interview → Incorrect

"Interview" involvesverbal discussions with personnel, not document analysis.

Why is the Correct Answer "Examine" (C)?

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Defines "Examine" asanalyzing assessment objects (e.g., policies, procedures, logs, documentation).

NIST SP 800-171A

Specifies "Examine" as a method toreview security controls and configurations.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

For a practice to beadequately implementedin aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theresponsible personnel must demonstrate knowledge of deployment, maintenance, and operationof security tools such asantivirus programs. Simply having the tool in place isnot sufficient—there must be evidence that it isproperly configured, updated, and monitoredto protect against threats.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. Relevant CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 Requirements

CMMC Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171, which includes:

Requirement 3.14.5 (System and Information Integrity - SI-3):

"Employautomatedmechanisms toidentify, report, and correctsystem flaws in a timely manner."

Requirement 3.14.6 (SI-3(2)):

"Employautomated toolsto detect and prevent malware execution."

These requirements imply that theperson responsible for antivirus must understand how it is deployed and maintainedto ensure compliance.

✅2. Why the Team Member’s Knowledge is Insufficient

Antivirus tools requireregular updates,configuration adjustments, andmonitoringto function properly.

The responsible team member must:

Knowhow the antivirus was deployedacross systems.

Be able toconfirm updates, logs, and alerts are monitored.

Understand how torespond to malware detectionsand failures.

If the team member lacks this knowledge, assessors maydetermine the practice is not fully implemented.

✅3. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Yes, the antivirus program is available, so it is sufficient.❌

Incorrect:Just having antivirus softwareinstalleddoes not prove compliance. It must bemanaged and maintained.

(B) Yes, antivirus programs are automated to run independently.❌

Incorrect:While automation helps, security toolsrequire oversight, updates, and configuration.

(D) No, the team member's interview answers about deployment and maintenance are insufficient.❌

Partially correct but incomplete:Themain issueis that the team membermust have sufficient knowledge, not just that their answers are weak.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:TheCMMC Assessment Guide for SI-3 and SI-3(2)states that personnel mustunderstand the function, deployment, and maintenance of security toolsto ensure proper implementation.

Thus, the correct answer is:

TheCMMC Scoping Guide for Level 2outlines thatCUI assetsinclude systems, applications, and services thatstore, process, or transmitControlled Unclassified Information (CUI). These are the three core functions that defineCUI handlingwithin anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC).

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. CUI Assets Defined in CMMC

Stored:CUI is saved on hard drives, cloud storage, or databases.

Processed:CUI is actively used, modified, or analyzed by applications and users.

Transmitted:CUI is sent between systems via email, file transfers, or network communication.

✅2. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Received and transferred❌

Whilereceiving and transferring CUIis part of handling CUI, it does not fully cover all CUI asset responsibilities.

(C) Entered, edited, manipulated, printed, and viewed❌

These arespecific actionswithinprocessingbut do not coverstorage or transmission, which are also required for CMMC scoping.

(D) Located on electronic media, on system component memory, and on paper❌

While CUI can exist inelectronic and physical forms, CMMC scoping focuses onhow CUI is actively managed (stored, processed, transmitted)rather than where it physically resides.

TheCMMC Level 2 Scoping Guideconfirms thatCUI Assets are categorized based on their role in storing, processing, or transmitting CUI.

NIST SP 800-171also defines these three functions as key components of CUI protection.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

Understanding CMMC 2.0 Levels and Their DescriptionsTheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0consists ofthree levels, each representing increasing cybersecurity maturity:

Level 1 – Foundational

Focuses onbasic cyber hygiene

Implements17 practicesaligned withFAR 52.204-21

Primarily protectsFederal Contract Information (FCI)

Level 2 – Advanced(Correct Answer)

Focuses onprotecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Implements110 practicesaligned withNIST SP 800-171

Requirestriennial third-party assessments for critical programs

Level 3 – Expert

Focuses onadvanced cybersecurityagainstAPT (Advanced Persistent Threats)

ImplementsNIST SP 800-171 and additional NIST SP 800-172 controls

Requirestriennial government-led assessments

TheCMMC 2.0 framework explicitly describes Level 2 as "Advanced."

Italigns with NIST SP 800-171to ensure robustCUI protection.

A. Expert (Incorrect)– This describesLevel 3, not Level 2.

C. Optimizing (Incorrect)– Not a defined CMMC level description.

D. Continuously Improved (Incorrect)– CMMC does not use this terminology.

The correct answer isB. Advanced, which accurately describesCMMC Level 2.

TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Process (CAP)outlines strict guidelines regardingconflicts of interest (COI)to ensure the integrity and impartiality of assessments conducted byCertified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs)andCertified Assessors (CAs).

The scenario presented involves apotential conflict of interestdue to a prior relationship (former college roommate) between thecertified assessorand an individual at theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC). While this prior relationship does not automatically disqualify the assessor, it must bedisclosed, documented, and mitigated appropriately.

Inform the OSC and C3PAO of the Potential Conflict of Interest

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)requires assessors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Transparency ensures that all parties, including theOSC and C3PAO, are aware of the situation.

Document the Conflict and Mitigation Actions in the Assessment Plan

PerCMMC CAP documentation, potential conflicts should be assessed based on their material impact on the objectivity of the assessment.

The conflict and proposed mitigation strategies must beformally recorded in the assessment planto provide an audit trail.

Determine If the Mitigation Actions Are Acceptable

If theOSC and C3PAOdetermine that the mitigation actions adequatelyeliminate or reduce the risk of bias, the assessment may proceed.

Common mitigation strategies include:

Assigning another assessor forinterviews with the conflicted individual.

Ensuring thatdecisions regarding the OSC’s compliance are reviewed independently.

Proceed with the Assessment If Mitigation Is Acceptable

If the mitigation actions sufficiently address the conflict, the assessment may continue understrict adherence to documented procedures.

CMMC Conflict of Interest Handling Process

A. Do not inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and continue as planned.❌Incorrect. This violates CMMC’s integrity requirements and could result indisciplinary actions against the assessor or invalidation of the assessment. Transparency is mandatory.

B. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and start the entire process over without the conflicted team member.❌Incorrect. The CAP doesnotmandate immediate reassignment unless the conflict isunresolvable. Instead, mitigation strategies should be considered first.

C. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest but since it has been an acceptable amount of time since college, no conflict of interest exists, and continue as planned.❌Incorrect.The passage of time alone does not automatically eliminate a conflict of interest. Proper documentation and mitigation are still required.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines COI requirements and mitigation actions.

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)– Outlines ethical responsibilities of assessors.

CMMC Accreditation Body (Cyber-AB) Guidance– Provides rules on conflict resolution.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option D is the most correct choice, as it aligns with the official CMMC conflict of interest procedures.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) serves as the authoritative body overseeing the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) program within the United States federal government. NARA maintains the CUI Registry, which is the definitive resource for all categories, subcategories, and associated markings of CUI. This registry provides comprehensive guidance on the identification and handling of CUI, ensuring standardized practices across federal agencies and their contractors.

The other options are delineated as follows:

CMMC-AB:The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Accreditation Body is responsible for overseeing the CMMC program but does not manage CUI classifications.

DoD Contractors FAQ:While it may offer guidance to Department of Defense contractors, it is not an authoritative source for CUI data classifications.

OSC's privacy policies:An Organization Seeking Certification's internal policies pertain to its own data handling practices and are not authoritative for CUI classifications.

Therefore, for authoritative information on CUI data classifications, the NARA's CUI Registry is the appropriate resource.

Step 1: Review CMMC 2.0 Reforms (Level 1 – Foundational)As part ofCMMC 2.0, the DoD announced changes toreduce burden and costsfor companies that only handleFederal Contract Information (FCI):

DoD Statement (CMMC 2.0 Overview):

“Level 1 (Foundational) will only require an annual self-assessment, affirming implementation of the 17 FAR 52.204-21 controls.”

✅Step 2: Intent of “Reduced Assessment Costs”The move to allowself-assessments at Level 1was explicitly designed toeliminate the costof hiring third-party assessors for organizations that only handle FCI.

Level 1 self-assessments are:

Conductedinternally by the OSC,

Affirmed annuallyby a senior company official,

Submitted via SPRS(Supplier Performance Risk System).

B. Opt out of CMMC Assessments✘ Incorrect. Organizations must still perform aself-assessmentannually — they cannot opt out entirely.

C. Have assessment costs reimbursed by the DoD✘ No such reimbursement mechanism exists.

D. Pay no more than $500.00…✘ No such fixed cost is set or guaranteed in CMMC documentation.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

UnderCMMC 2.0, all companies atLevel 1 (Foundational)are permitted toconduct self-assessmentsannually to demonstrate compliance, supporting the DoD’s goal ofreducing assessment costsfor low-risk contractors.

Understanding Affirmations in a CMMC AssessmentAffirmations are a type ofevidencecollected during aCMMC assessmentto confirm compliance with required practices. Affirmations are typically collected from:

✅Interviews– Conversations with personnel implementing security practices.

✅Demonstrations– Observing the practice in action.

✅Emails and Messaging– Written communications confirming compliance efforts.

✅Presentations– Documents or briefings explaining security implementations.

✅Screenshots–Visual evidenceof system configurations and security measures.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guidestates that assessors may collectaffirmations via various communication methods, including emails, messaging, and presentations.

Screenshotsare an additional valid form ofobjective evidenceto confirm compliance.

Options A and B are incorrectbecause emails and messaging are explicitlyallowedforms of affirmation.

Option C is incompletebecause it does not mention screenshots, which are also considered valid evidence.

Why "Yes, the affirmations collected by the assessor are all appropriate, as are screenshots" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. No, emails are not appropriate affirmations.

❌Incorrect–Emailsarea valid affirmation method.

B. No, messaging is not an appropriate affirmation.

❌Incorrect–Messagingisallowed for collecting affirmations.

C. Yes, the affirmations collected by the assessor are all appropriate.

❌Incorrect–Screenshots should also be considered valid evidence.

D. Yes, the affirmations collected by the assessor are all appropriate, as are screenshots.

✅Correct – Screenshots are also a valid form of affirmation.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Defines allowable evidence collection methods, including affirmations through written communication.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Yes, the affirmations collected by the assessor are all appropriate, as are screenshots.This aligns withCMMC 2.0 assessment proceduresfor collecting affirmations.

Understanding Assessment Methods in CMMC 2.0According to theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, assessors usethree primary assessment methodsto determine compliance with security practices:

Examine– Reviewing documents, policies, configurations, and system records.

Interview– Speaking with personnel to gather insights into security processes.

Test– Performing technical validation of system functions and security controls.

TheAssessment Team Memberis inspectingAssessment Objects(e.g., system configurations, user access control settings, policies) to determine if the OSC's evidence is sufficient forAC.L1-3.1.1 (Access Control – Authorized Users).

This activity aligns directly with theExaminemethod, which involves reviewing artifacts such as:

Access control lists (ACLs)

System user authentication logs

Account management policies

Role-based access control settings

"Observe" (Option B)is incorrect because "observing" is not an official assessment method in CMMC.

"Test" (Option A)is incorrect because the assessment is not actively executing a function but ratherreviewingevidence.

"Interview" (Option D)is incorrect because no personnel are being questioned—only documentation is being reviewed.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 3.5 – Assessment Methods

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide – Access Control Practices (AC.L1-3.1.1)

Why Option C (Examine) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSince the activity involves reviewing documents and records to verify access control measures, it falls under theExaminemethod, makingOption C the correct answer.

This question deals withasset categorizationduring aCMMC Level 1 Self-Assessment. The organization is manufacturingspecialized partsfor the DoD, butLevel 1of CMMC only concernsFederal Contract Information (FCI)—notControlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Therefore, asset categorization should follow theCMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 1.

✅Step 1: Understand CMMC Level 1 and FCI

Level 1 Objective:

Implement basic safeguarding requirements as perFAR 52.204-21.

Applies to systems thatstore, process, or transmit FCI.

Self-assessments are permitted and required annually.

Source Reference:

CMMC Scoping Guidance – Level 1 (v1.0)

https://dodcio.defense.gov/CMMC

✅Step 2: What is an “In-scope Asset”?

CMMC Scoping Guidance – Level 1definesIn-scope assetsas:

“Assets that process, store, or transmit FCI or provide security protection for such assets.”

In this scenario:

The machining company isperforming contract work(manufacturing DoD parts).

Thetesting is done internally, implying the systems and equipment used in testing and documentation aredirectly supporting the contract.

These systems likely handleFCIsuch as technical specifications, purchase orders, or test reports.

➡️Therefore, the equipment and systems used in testing are consideredIn-scope Assetsunder Level 1.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. CUI Asset

✘Incorrect forLevel 1:

CUI is only in scope atCMMC Level 2 and Level 3.

Level 1 is concerned withFCI, not CUI.

C. Specialized Asset

✘Incorrect definition:

Specialized assets(defined inCMMC Level 2 Scoping) include IoT, OT, ICS, GFE, and similar types of non-enterprise assets that may require alternative treatment.

This classification isnot used in Level 1 Scoping.

D. Contractor Risk Managed Asset

✘Incorrect:

Also defined underCMMC Level 2 Scopingonly.

These are assets that are not security-protected but are managed via risk-based decisions.

This term isnot applicableforCMMC Level 1 assessments.

✅Step 3: Alignment with Official Documentation

According to theCMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 1:

“The assets within the self-assessment scope are those that process, store, or transmit FCI. These assets are considered ‘in-scope.’”

No other asset categorization (such as CUI asset, specialized asset, or contractor risk managed asset) is used atLevel 1.

BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front):

For aCMMC Level 1 Self-Assessment, theonlyasset category officially recognized is theIn-scope Asset— any asset that handles or protects FCI. Since the company's internal testing operations are part of fulfilling the DoD contract, the systems and staff involved arein scope.

Understanding the Definition of a "Practice" in CMMC 2.0In CMMC 2.0, the term"practice"refers to specific cybersecurity activities that organizations must implement to achieve compliance with defined security objectives.

Definition from CMMC Documentation:

According to theCMMC Model Overview, apracticeis defined as:

Step-by-Step Breakdown:"An activity or activities performed to meet defined CMMC objectives."

This means that practices are theactions and implementations required to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Federal Contract Information (FCI).

How Practices Fit into CMMC 2.0:

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 consists of17 practices, which align withFAR 52.204-21 (Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems).

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 consists of110 practices, aligned directly withNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2.

Each practice has anobjectivethat must be met to demonstrate compliance.

Official CMMC 2.0 References:

TheCMMC 2.0 Model Documentationdefines practices as "the fundamental cybersecurity activities necessary to achieve security objectives."

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideoutlines how assessors verify the implementation of these practices during an assessment.

TheNIST SP 800-171A Guideprovidesassessment objectivesfor each practice to ensure they are implemented effectively.

Comparison with Other Answer Choices:

A. A business transaction→ Incorrect. CMMC practices focus on cybersecurity activities, not financial or operational transactions.

B. A condition arrived at by experience or exercise→ Incorrect. While practices evolve over time, they are defined activities, not just experience-based conditions.

C. A series of changes taking place in a defined manner→ Incorrect. A practice is a set of security actions, not just a process of change.

Conclusion:ACMMC practicerefers to specificcybersecurity activities performed to meet defined CMMC objectives. This makesOption Dthe correct answer.

CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) 2.0 Level 1 is designed to protectFederal Contract Information (FCI)and consists of17 foundational cybersecurity practices. These practices are directly derived fromFAR 52.204-21(Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems), which outlines minimum security requirements for contractors handling FCI.

Breakdown of CMMC Level 1 PracticesThe17 practicesin Level 1 focus on basic cybersecurity hygiene and fall under the following6 domains:

Access Control (AC)– 4 practices

AC.L1-3.1.1: Limit system access to authorized users

AC.L1-3.1.2: Limit user access to authorized transactions and functions

AC.L1-3.1.20: Verify and control connections to external systems

AC.L1-3.1.22: Control information posted or processed on publicly accessible systems

Identification and Authentication (IA)– 2 practices

IA.L1-3.5.1: Identify and authenticate system users

IA.L1-3.5.2: Use multifactor authentication for local and network access

Media Protection (MP)– 1 practice

MP.L1-3.8.3: Sanitize media before disposal or reuse

Physical Protection (PE)– 4 practices

PE.L1-3.10.1: Limit physical access to systems containing FCI

PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity

PE.L1-3.10.4: Maintain audit logs of physical access

PE.L1-3.10.5: Control and manage physical access devices

System and Communications Protection (SC)– 2 practices

SC.L1-3.13.1: Monitor and control communications at system boundaries

SC.L1-3.13.5: Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components

System and Information Integrity (SI)– 4 practices

SI.L1-3.14.1: Identify, report, and correct system flaws in a timely manner

SI.L1-3.14.2: Provide protection from malicious code at designated locations

SI.L1-3.14.4: Update malicious code protection mechanisms periodically

SI.L1-3.14.5: Perform scans of system components and real-time file scans

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationThe 17 practices forCMMC Level 1are explicitly listed in theCMMC 2.0 Appendices and Assessment Guide for Level 1, as well as in theFAR 52.204-21 requirements. These practices representbasic safeguarding measuresthat all DoD contractors handlingFCImust implement.

????CMMC 2.0 Level 1 Summary:

Focus:Basic safeguarding of FCI

Total Practices:17

Derived From:FAR 52.204-21

Assessment Type:Self-assessment (annual)

Final Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isB. 17 practicesas verified from theCMMC 2.0 official documentsandFAR 52.204-21 requirements.

Understanding the Role of NIST SP 800-171 in CMMCNIST Special Publication (SP)800-171is the definitive standard for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)innonfederal systems and organizations. It provides security requirements that organizations handling CUImust implementto protect sensitive government information.

This document isthe foundationofCMMC 2.0 Level 2compliance, which aligns directly withNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2requirements.

Breakdown of Answer ChoicesNIST SP

Title

Relevance to CMMC

NIST SP 800-37

Risk Management Framework (RMF)

Focuses on risk assessment for federal agencies, not directly applicable to CUI in nonfederal systems.

NIST SP 800-53

Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Systems

Provides security controls forfederalinformation systems, not specifically tailored tononfederalorganizations handling CUI.

NIST SP 800-88

Guidelines for Media Sanitization

Covers secure data destruction and disposal, not overall CUI protection.

NIST SP 800-171

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations

✅Correct Answer – Directly addresses CUI protection in contractor systems.

Key Requirements from NIST SP 800-171The document outlines110 security controlsgrouped into14 families, including:

Access Control (AC)– Restrict access to authorized users.

Audit and Accountability (AU)– Maintain system logs and monitor activity.

Incident Response (IR)– Establish an incident response plan.

System and Communications Protection (SC)– Encrypt CUI in transit and at rest.

These controls serve as thebaseline requirementsfor organizations seekingCMMC Level 2 certificationto work withCUI.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2alignsdirectlywith NIST SP800-171 Rev. 2.

DoD contractors that handle CUImustcomply withall 110 controlsfrom NIST SP800-171.

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. NIST SP 800-171, as this documentexplicitly definesthe cybersecurity requirements for protectingCUI in nonfederal systems and organizations.

Understanding Policy Validation in CMMC AssessmentsDuring a CMMC assessment, policies must be evaluated based on:

Who has the authority to approve and enforce them

Whether they are current and implemented effectively

The validity of a policydoes not solely depend on the signatorybut rather onhow the organization assigns authority for policy creation, approval, and enforcement.

Some organizations assignauthority to a specific person, meaning anew signatory may be requiredwhen leadership changes.

Others assign authority to aposition/title(e.g., CISO, IT Director), in which casea new signature may not be requiredas long as the role remains responsible for policy enforcement.

The assessment teammust review the organization's policy management processto determine if the policy remains valid despite leadership turnover.

Key Considerations in Policy Validation:Thus,the correct answer is B, as additional research is needed to confirm whether the organization's policy is tied to the individual or the position.

A. The signatory is the authority to implement and enforce the policy, and since that person is no longer with the company, the policy is not valid.❌Incorrect. This assumes thatauthority is always tied to a person, which is not always the case. Some organizations delegate authorityto a position, not an individual.

C. The signatory does not validate or invalidate the policy. For the purpose of this assessment, ensuring that the policy is current and is being implemented by the individuals who are performing the work is sufficient.❌Incorrect. While implementation is crucial,the authority behind the policy must also be validatedper CMMC documentation requirements.

D. The authority to implement and enforce lies with the position, not the person. As long as that position's authority and responsibilities have not been removed from implementing that domain, it is still a valid policy.❌Incorrect. This assumes thatauthority is always assigned to a position, which is not universally true. More research is required to confirm this.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Outlines the importance of verifying the authority and enforcement of policies.

NIST SP 800-171 (3.12.1 - Security Policies and Procedures)– Requires that policies be maintained and enforced by appropriate personnel.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option B (More research on the company policy is needed) is the correct answer, as per official CMMC policy validation guidance.

Understanding Multi-Function Device (MFD) Security in CMMCMulti-function devices (MFDs), such asscanners, printers, and copiers,process, store, and transmit FCI, making them apotential attack surfacefor unauthorized access.

Thebest technical controlto limit MFD access to only authorized systems isVirtual LAN (VLAN) restrictions, whichsegment and isolate network traffic.

VLAN Restrictions Provide Network Segmentation

VLANsisolate the MFDfrom unauthorized systems, ensuringonly approved devicescan communicate with it.

Prevents unauthorized network access bylimiting connectionsto specific IPs or subnets.

Meets CMMC 2.0 Network Security Controls

Aligns withCMMC System and Communications Protection (SC) Practicesfor network segmentation and access control.

Reducesthe risk of unauthorized access to scanned and printed FCI.

B. Single administrative account→Incorrect

Asingle admin accountdoes not restrict accessbetween devices, only controlswho can configurethe MFD.

C. Documentation showing MFD configuration→Incorrect

Documentation helps with compliance butdoes not actively restrict access.

D. Access lists only known to the IT administrator→Incorrect

Access lists should besystem-enforced, not just "known" to the administrator.

CMMC Practice SC.3.192 (Network Segmentation)– Requires restricting access usingnetwork segmentation techniques such as VLANs.

NIST SP 800-171 (SC Family)– Supportsisolation of sensitive devicesusing VLANs and other segmentation controls.

Why the Correct Answer is "A. Virtual LAN (VLAN) Restrictions"?Why Not the Other Options?Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:SinceVirtual LAN (VLAN) restrictions enforce access control at the network level, the correct answer isA. Virtual LAN (VLAN) restrictions.

Understanding CMMC 2.0 Incident Response PracticesTheIncident Response (IR) domaininCMMC 2.0 Level 2aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Section 3.6, which defines requirements forestablishing and maintaining an incident response capability.

The documentation provideddescribes an incident response capability that includes preparation, detection, analysis, containment, recovery, and user response activities.

IR.L2-3.6.1specifically requires organizations toestablish an incident handling processcovering:

Preparation

Detection & Analysis

Containment

Eradication & Recovery

Post-Incident Response

B. IR.L2-3.6.2: Incident Reporting (Incorrect)

Incident reporting focuses on reporting incidents to external parties (e.g., DoD, DIBNet),which isnot what the provided documentation describes.

C. IR.L2-3.6.3: Incident Response Testing (Incorrect)

Incident response testing ensures that the response process is regularly tested and evaluated,which isnot the primary focus of the documentation provided.

D. IR.L2-3.6.4: Incident Spillage (Incorrect)

Incident spillage specifically refers to CUI exposure or handling unauthorized CUI incidents,which isnot the scenario described.

The correct answer isA. IR.L2-3.6.1: Incident Handling, as the documentationattests to the establishment of an incident response capability.

Anorganization seeking helpto address security gaps—such asphysical access control deficiencies—needs acertified professional who can provide implementation supportwithoutbeing involved in the actual CMMC assessment.

A Registered Practitioner (RP)is a CMMC-certified individualwho provides consulting and implementation supportto organizations butdoes not perform assessments.

RPs work independently from C3PAOsand canassist in fixing gapsin security controlsbeforeorafteran assessment.

Since RPs are not assessors, they can provide direct remediation supportwithout any conflict of interest.

The OSC needs assistance in implementing security controls(not assessment).

An RP is trained and authorized to provide remediation and advisory services.

Conflict of interest rules prevent the assessing C3PAO from providing implementation support.

A. CCA of the C3PAO performing the assessment (Incorrect)

ACertified CMMC Assessor (CCA)is responsible for conducting the assessmentonly.

TheC3PAO performing the assessment cannot also provide remediationdue to aconflict of interest.

C. Practitioner of the Organization Performing the Assessment LTP (Incorrect)

The assessmentLead Technical Practitioner (LTP)cannot provide remediation support for an OSC they are assessing.

D. DoD Contract Official of the Organization Performing the Assessment (Incorrect)

DoD Contract Officialsoversee contract compliance butdo not provide cybersecurity implementation support.

The correct answer isB. RP of an organization not part of the assessment, asonly independent RPs can assist with remediation and implementation support.

Understanding RA.L2-3.11.1 Risk Assessment Scope in CMMC Level 2TheCMMC Level 2 control RA.L2-3.11.1aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Requirement 3.11.1, which mandates that organizationsperiodically assess risks to operations, assets, and individuals arising from the processing, storage, or transmission of CUI.

What is Required for Compliance?

The organization must performrisk assessments on all assets and entities involved in handling CUI.

Risk assessments mustevaluate potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts on CUI security.

The scopemust include people, processes, physical locations, and IT systemsto ensure comprehensive risk management.

Why the Correct Answer is "Processes, people, physical entities, and IT systems in which CUI is processed, stored, or transmitted":

CUIcan be exposed to risk in multiple ways—not just IT systems but also human error, physical security gaps, and process weaknesses.

Risk assessmentsmust evaluate all areas that could impact CUI security, including:

Personnel security risks(e.g., insider threats, phishing attacks).

Process vulnerabilities(e.g., mishandling of CUI, policy weaknesses).

Physical security risks(e.g., unauthorized access to servers, storage rooms).

IT systems(e.g., networks, servers, cloud environments processing CUI).

A. "IT systems"→Too narrow.Risk assessmentmust cover more than just IT systems, includingpeople, physical assets, and processesaffecting CUI.

B. "Enterprise systems"→Too broad.While enterprise systems might be assessed, thefocus is specifically on areas handling CUI, not all enterprise operations.

C. "CUI Marking processes"→Incorrect focus.While marking CUI correctly is important,RA.L2-3.11.1 pertains to risk assessments, not data classification.

ACertified CMMC Professional (CCP)advising anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)must ensure thatFederal Contract Information (FCI)andControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)are properly documented within required security documents.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. System Security Plan (SSP)

CMMC Level 2requires anSSPto documenthow CUI is protected, including:

Security controlsimplemented

Asset categorization(CUI Assets, Security Protection Assets, etc.)

Policies and proceduresfor handling CUI

✅2. Asset Inventory

Anasset inventorylistsall relevant IT systems, applications, and hardwarethat store, process, or transmitCUI or FCI.

TheCMMC Scoping Guiderequires OSCs to identifyCUI-relevant assetsas part of their compliance.

✅3. Network Diagram

Anetwork diagramvisually representshow data flows across systems, showing:

WhereCUI is transmitted and stored

Security boundaries protectingCUI Assets

Connectivity betweenCUI Assets and Security Protection Assets

✅4. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(B) Within the hardware inventory, data flow diagram, and in the network diagram❌

While adata flow diagramis useful,hardware inventory alone is insufficientto document CUI.

(C) Within the asset inventory, in the proposal response, and in the network diagram❌

Aproposal responseis not a required document for CMMC assessments.

(D) In the network diagram, in the SSP, within the base inventory, and in the proposal response❌

Base inventoryis not a specific CMMC documentation requirement.

TheCMMC Assessment Guideconfirms that FCI and CUI must be documented in:

The SSP

The asset inventory

The network diagram

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:Thus, the correct answer is:

✅A. "In the SSP, within the asset inventory, and in the network diagram."

Understanding FCI and Asset CategorizationFederal Contract Information (FCI)is any informationnot intended for public releasethat is provided by or generated for thegovernmentunder aDoD contract.

Acompany-issued laptopused by a sales representative to enter FCI into aspreadsheetis considered anFCI assetbecause it:

✅Stores FCI– The spreadsheet contains sensitive information.

✅Processes FCI– The representative is entering data into the spreadsheet.

✅Organizes FCI– The spreadsheet helps structure and manage FCI data.

Processing (Option B and C)is occurring, but since the laptop is primarily being used toorganize data,Option D is the most comprehensive.

Transmission (Option A and C)is not explicitly mentioned, soOption D is the best fit.

Why "Store, Process, and Organize FCI" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Process and transmit FCI.

❌Incorrect–No indication oftransmissionis provided.

B. Process and organize FCI.

❌Incorrect–Storage is also a key function of the laptop.

C. Store, process, and transmit FCI.

❌Incorrect–Transmission is not confirmed in the scenario.

D. Store, process, and organize FCI.

✅Correct – The laptop is used to store, process, and organize FCI in a spreadsheet.

CMMC Asset Categorization Guidelines– DefinesFCI assetsbased onstorage, processing, and organization functions.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Store, process, and organize FCI, as the laptop is used tostore information, enter (process) data, and structure (organize) FCI within a spreadsheet.

When preparing forCMMC compliance, organizations must ensure that theirnetwork configurations align with required cybersecurity controls. Ifnetwork administratorsdisagree on certain configurations, the mostobjective and accurateway to resolve the disagreement is by referencingofficial CMMC guidanceandNIST SP 800-171 requirements, which form the foundation of CMMC Level 2.

CMMC Assessment Guides as the Primary Reference

TheCMMC Assessment Guides (Level 1 & Level 2)provide clearinterpretationsof security practices.

Theyexplain how each practice should be implemented and assessedduring certification.

NIST SP 800-171 as the Compliance Baseline

CMMC Level 2is based directly onNIST SP 800-171, which outlines the110 security controlsrequired for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Network configurations must complywith NIST-defined security requirements, including:

Access Control (AC) – Ensuring least privilege principles.

Audit and Accountability (AU) – Logging and monitoring network activity.

System and Communications Protection (SC) – Secure network design and encryption.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Consult with the CEO of the company:

ACEO is not necessarily a cybersecurity expertand may not be familiar with CMMC technical requirements.

Technical compliance decisions should be based onCMMC and NISTframeworks, not executive opinions.

(C) Go with the network administrator's ideas with the least stringent controls:

Choosingless stringent controls increases security riskand could lead toCMMC non-compliance.

(D) Go with the network administrator's ideas with the most stringent controls:

While security is important,more stringent controlsmay introduceoperational inefficienciesorunnecessary coststhat are not required for compliance.

The correct approach is to implement what is required by CMMC and NIST SP 800-171, no more and no less.

TheCMMC Assessment GuidesandNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2areofficial sourcesthat provide the most reliable guidance on compliance.

CMMC Level 2 is entirely based on NIST SP 800-171, making it the definitive source for resolving security disagreements.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:Thus, the correct answer is:

B. Consult the CMMC Assessment Guides and NIST SP 800-171.

This question pertains to theminimum evidence requirementsneeded by a CMMCAssessment Teamto score a practice asMETduring aLevel 2 Assessment.

The CMMC Level 2 assessment must align withNIST SP 800-171and follow the procedures outlined in theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide v1.0, particularly aroundevidence collection and scoring methodology.

✅Step 1: Refer to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide v1.0CAP v1.0 – Section 3.5.4: Evaluate Evidence and Score Practices“To assign a MET determination, the Assessment Team must collect and corroborate at least two types of objective evidence: either through examination of artifacts, interviews (affirmation), or testing (demonstration).”

This meansat least two typesof the following evidence are required:

Examine(documentation/artifacts),

Interview(affirmation from personnel),

Test(demonstration of implementation).

✅Step 2: Clarify the Official Minimum Standard for a Practice to be Scored METThe CAP explicitly states:

“A practice can only be scored MET when a minimum oftwo types of evidencefrom the E-I-T (Examine, Interview, Test) triad are successfully collected and evaluated.”

Theevidence types must come from two different categories, for example:

An artifact(Examine)+ an interview affirmation(Interview),

A demonstration(Test)+ an interview(Interview),

Etc.

This cross-validation ensures that the control isimplemented, documented, and understoodby personnel — a core principle in assessing effective cybersecurity implementation.

❌Why the Other Options Are IncorrectA. All three types of evidence are documented for every control✘Incorrect:While collecting all three types (E-I-T) strengthens the assessment, theminimum requirementis onlytwo. Collecting all three isnot requiredfor a practice to be scoredMET.

B. Examine and accept evidence from one of the three evidence types✘Incorrect:This fails to meet theminimum two-evidence-type requirementset by the CAP. Single-source evidence is not sufficient to score a practice as MET.

C. Complete one of the following; examine two artifacts, observe one demonstration, or receive one affirmation✘Incorrect:Even if two artifacts are examined,this is still only one type of evidence(Examine). The CAP requires twotypes— not two instances of the same type.

✅Why D is CorrectD. Complete two of the following: examine one artifact, either observe a satisfactory demonstration of one control or receive one affirmation from the OSC personnel.

✔ This directly reflects theCAP’s requirement for collecting two different types of objective evidenceto determine a practice is MET.

BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front):To score a CMMC Level 2 practice asMET, the Assessment Team must collecta minimum of two distinct types of evidence— from theExamine, Interview, Test (E-I-T)categories. This requirement is clearly stated in the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0.

Understanding the Best Source for CMMC Practice DescriptionsTheCMMC Assessment Guide (Levels 1 and 2)is theprimaryandmost authoritativedocument for detailed descriptions of each practice and process within the variousCMMC domains.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. What is the CMMC Assessment Guide?

TheCMMC Assessment Guideprovides detailed explanations of:

EachCMMC practicewithin its respectivedomain.

Theassessment objectivesfor verifying implementation.

Examples ofevidence requiredto demonstrate compliance.

CMMC 2.0 includes two levels:

Level 1: 17 basic cybersecurity practices.

Level 2: 110 practices aligned withNIST SP 800-171.

TheAssessment Guidedefines howassessorsevaluate compliance.

✅2. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) CMMC Glossary❌

TheGlossaryprovidesdefinitions of termsused in CMMC but does not describe specific practices in detail.

(B) CMMC Appendices❌

Appendicesinclude supplementary information likereferences and scoping guidance, but they do not provide full descriptions of practices.

(C) CMMC Assessment Process❌

TheAssessment Process Guideexplainshowassessments are conducted, but it doesnot describe each practicein detail.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:TheCMMC Assessment Guide (Levels 1 and 2)is theofficialsource for descriptions of eachCMMC practice and process, making it thebest referencefor understanding compliance requirements.

Planning and preparing for aCMMC assessmentinvolves collaboration between theassessorand theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)to determine scope, required evidence, and logistics. This planning process isdynamicand must adapt as new information emerges.

Assessment Scope and Requirements May Change

As assessors gather evidence and analyze the environment,new details about assets, networks, and security controlsmay require adjustments to the assessment plan.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideemphasizes that assessmentrequirements and scope should be continuously reviewed and updatedto reflect real-time findings.

Assessors Follow an Adaptive Approach

DuringCMMC assessments, organizations may discover additionalFCI or CUI assets, which can change the required security practices to be evaluated.

Assessors shouldrevise the assessment approach accordinglyrather than strictly following an initial, unchangeable plan.

A. Scoping an assessment is easy and worry-free→Incorrect

Scoping is acritical and complex processthat requires careful evaluation of the OSC’s information systems and assets.

CMMC Scoping Guidestates thatidentifying in-scope assets is crucial and requires significant effort.

B. The initial plan cannot be changed once agreed upon→Incorrect

Theinitial assessment plan is a starting point, butit must be flexiblebased on real-time findings.

CMMC CAP Guideemphasizescontinuous refinementduring the assessment process.

C. There is a determined amount of time that the OSC's point of contact has to submit evidence and rough order-of-magnitude→Incorrect

While there aretimelines, the key focus is ensuring thatall necessary evidence is gathered accuratelyrather than rushing to meet a strict deadline.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– States that assessment requirements and planning should be updated as additional information is gathered.

CMMC Scoping Guide (Nov 2021)– Explains that assessors must continually refinein-scope assets and requirementsthroughout the process.

Why the Correct Answer is "D"?Why Not the Other Options?Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:Assessment planning is a dynamic process.Assessors must continuously review and update the requirements and planas new information emerges, makingDthe correct answer.

Step 1: Define CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)CUI is information thatrequires safeguarding or dissemination controlspursuant to and consistent with applicable law, regulations, and government-wide policies, butis not classifiedunder Executive Order 13526 or the Atomic Energy Act.

✅Step 2: Authority over CUI — NARA’s RoleNARA – National Archives and Records Administration, specifically theInformation Security Oversight Office (ISOO), is thegovernment-wide executive agentresponsible for implementing the CUI program.

Source:

32 CFR Part 2002 – Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Executive Order 13556 – Controlled Unclassified Information

CUI Registry – https://www.archives.gov/cui

NARA:

Maintains theCUI Registry,

Issuesmarking and handling guidance,

DefinesCUI categoriesand their authority under law or regulation,

Trains and informs Federal agencies and contractors on CUI policy.

B. NIST✘ NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) developstechnical standards(e.g., SP 800-171), but it doesnot define or mark CUI. It helps secure CUI once it’s identified.

C. CMMC-AB (now Cyber AB)✘ The Cyber AB is theCMMC ecosystem’s accreditation body, not a government agency, and hasno authority over CUI classification or marking.

D. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)✘ While DHS mayhandle and protect CUI internally, it is not the executive agent for the CUI program.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

NARAis theofficial U.S. government authorityresponsible for defining, categorizing, and marking CUI via theCUI Registryand associated policies underExecutive Order 13556.

During aCMMC assessment, organizations must provide evidence to demonstrate compliance with requiredpractices and processes. Assessors evaluate this evidence based on two key criteria:

Adequacy– Does the evidence meet the intent of the security requirement?

Sufficiency– Is there enough evidence to reasonably conclude that the practice/process is effectively implemented?

These principles are outlined in theCMMC Assessment Process Guide, which provides a structured approach for evaluating compliance.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. Adequacy – Does the evidence fully meet the requirement?

Adequacyrefers to whether the evidence properly demonstrates that the security practice has been implemented as required.

Example: If an organization claims to enforceMulti-Factor Authentication (MFA), an assessor would checksystem configurations, login policies, and user authentication logsto confirm that MFA is actually in use.

✅2. Sufficiency – Is there enough evidence to support the claim?

Sufficiencymeans that there isenough supporting evidenceto prove compliance.

Example: If an organization providesonly one screenshot of an MFA login screen, that alone may not besufficient—additional logs, policies, and user records would help strengthen the case.

(B) Adequacy and Thoroughness❌

Thoroughnessis not a defined metric in CMMC evidence evaluation.

The focus is onwhether the evidence meets the requirement (adequacy)and if there isenough of it (sufficiency).

(C) Sufficiency and Thoroughness❌

Thoroughnessis not a recognized term in CMMC compliance validation.

Evidence must beadequate and sufficient, not just thorough.

(D) Sufficiency and Appropriateness❌

Appropriatenessis not a CMMC-defined criterion.

Thecorrect terms used in CMMC assessmentsareAdequacy(Does it meet the requirement?) andSufficiency(Is there enough proof?).

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

CMMC Assessment Process Guideexplicitly states that evidence must be evaluated based onadequacyandsufficiencyto confirm compliance with security practices.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

Understanding Access Control (AC) in CMMC Advanced (Level 3)TheCMMC Advanced Level (Level 3)is designed for organizations handlinghigh-value Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)and aligns with a subset ofNIST SP 800-172for advanced cybersecurity protections.

Access Control (AC) Practices in CMMC Level 3✅CMMC Level 1 includesbasic AC practices fromFAR 52.204-21(e.g., restricting access to authorized users).

✅CMMC Level 2 includesallAccess Control (AC) practices from NIST SP 800-171(e.g., managing privileged access).

✅CMMC Level 3 expands on Levels 1 and 2, incorporatingadditional protections from NIST SP 800-172, such as enhanced monitoring and adversary deception techniques.

CMMC Level 3 builds upon all previous levels, includingAccess Control (AC) practices from Levels 1 and 2.

Options A, B, and C are incorrectbecause Level 3 includesallprevious AC practices fromLevels 1 and 2, plus additional ones.

Why "Levels 1, 2, and 3" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Level 1

❌Incorrect–Level 3 includes AC practices fromLevels 1 and 2, not just Level 1.

B. Level 3

❌Incorrect – Level 3 builds onLevels 1 and 2, not just Level 3 practices.

C. Levels 1 and 2

❌Incorrect–Level 3 containsadditionalAC practices beyond Levels 1 and 2.

D. Levels 1, 2, and 3

✅Correct – Level 3 contains all AC practices from Levels 1 and 2, plus additional ones.

CMMC Model Framework– Outlines howLevel 3 builds upon Level 1 and 2 practices.

NIST SP 800-172– Definesadvanced cybersecurity controlsrequired inCMMC Level 3.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Levels 1, 2, and 3, as CMMC Level 3 includesAccess Control (AC) practices from all previous levels plus additional enhancements.

Understanding IA.L2-3.5.3: Multifactor Authentication (MFA) RequirementTheIA.L2-3.5.3practice, derived fromNIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.5.3), requires thatmultifactor authentication (MFA) be implemented for both privileged and standard userswhen accessing:

✔Organizational endpoints(e.g., laptops, desktops, mobile devices).

✔Network resources(e.g., VPNs, internal systems).

✔Cloud services containing Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Key Requirement for a "MET" RatingFor IA.L2-3.5.3 to beMet, the organization must:

Require MFA for all privileged users(e.g., system administrators).

Require MFA for standard users accessing endpoints and network resources.

Implement MFA across all relevant systems.

Sincestandard users do not require MFA in the OSC’s current implementation, the practiceis not fully implementedand must be ratedNOT MET.

A. The process is running correctly → Incorrect

MFA isonly applied to privileged users, but it isalso required for standard users. The process isnot fully implemented.

B. It is out of scope as this is a new acquisition → Incorrect

New acquisitionsmust still meet MFA requirementsif they handle CUI or network access.

C. The new acquisition is considered Specialized Assets → Incorrect

Specialized assets (e.g., IoT, legacy systems) may have alternative security controls, but standard users and endpointsmust still comply with MFA.

D. Practice is NOT MET since the objective was not implemented → Correct

MFA must be enabled for both privileged and standard usersaccessing endpoints and network resources. Since standard users are excluded, the practice isNOT MET.

Why is the Correct Answer "D" (Practice is NOT MET since the objective was not implemented)?

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (Advanced) Requirements

Specifies thatMFA must be applied to all users accessing CUI and network resources.

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.5.3 – MFA Implementation)

Requires MFA forall user types, including privileged and standard users.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

States that a practicemust be fully implemented to be considered MET. Partial implementation meansNOT MET.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Who is Responsible for Marking CUI?According toDoDI 5200.48 (Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)), the responsibility for marking CUI falls on theauthorized holder of the information.

Definition of an Authorized Holder

PerDoDI 5200.48, Section 3.4, anauthorized holderis anyone who has beengranted accessto CUI and is responsible for handling, safeguarding, and marking it according toDoD CUI policy.

The authorized holder may be:

ADoD employee

Acontractorhandling CUI

Anyorganization or individual authorizedto access and manage CUI

DoD Guidance on CUI Marking Responsibilities

DoDI 5200.48, Section 4.2:

The individual creating or handling CUImust apply the appropriate markings as per the DoD CUI Registry guidelines.

DoDI 5200.48, Section 5.2:

Themarking responsibility is NOT limited to a specific positionlike an Information Disclosure Official or a high-level DoD office.

Instead, it is theresponsibility of the person or entity generating, handling, or disseminatingthe CUI.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) DoD OUSD (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense):

The OUSD plays apolicy-setting rolebut doesnot directly mark CUI.

(C) Information Disclosure Official:

This role is responsible forpublic release of information, but marking CUI is the duty of theauthorized holdermanaging the data.

(D) Presidential authorized Original Classification Authority (OCA):

OCAs classifynational security information (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret), not CUI, which isnot classified information.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:Final Validation from DoDI 5200.48:PerDoDI 5200.48, authorized holders are explicitly responsible for marking CUI, making this the correct answer.

Understanding the CMMC Readiness Review ProcessALead Assessorconducting aCMMC Readiness Reviewevaluates whether anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)is prepared for a formal assessment.

After recording theassessment risk statusandoverall assessment feasibility, theminimum remaining criteriato be verified include:

Logistics Planning– Ensuring that the assessment timeline, locations, and necessary resources are in place.

Assessment Team Preparation– Confirming that assessors and required personnel are available and briefed.

Evidence Readiness– Ensuring the OSC has gathered all required artifacts and documentation for review.

Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Determine the practice pass/fail results.

Happensduringthe formal assessment, not the readiness review.

❌Incorrect

B. Determine the preliminary recommended findings.

Findings are only madeafterthe full assessment.

❌Incorrect

C. Determine the initial model practice ratings and record them.

Ratings are assigned during theassessment, not readiness review.

❌Incorrect

D. Determine the logistics, Assessment Team, and the evidence readiness.

✅Essential readiness criteria that must be confirmedbeforeassessment starts.

✅Correct

TheCMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)states that readiness review ensureslogistics, assessment team availability, and evidence readinessare verified.

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Determine the logistics, Assessment Team, and the evidence readiness.This aligns withCMMC readiness review requirements.

Step 1: Understand the Definitions of Evidence Evaluation CriteriaTheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)introduces two key criteria for evaluating evidence:

Adequacy– Does the evidencealign with the practice?

Sufficiency– Is the evidencecomprehensive enoughin terms ofcoverage across systems, users, and scope?

CAP v1.0 – Section 3.5.4:

“Evidence must be evaluated for bothadequacy(is it the right evidence?) andsufficiency(is there enough of it across all in-scope assets and areas?) to score a practice as MET.”

✅Step 2: Applying to the ScenarioIn the question, the Lead Assessor is asking the team toverify that evidence is sufficient across:

Domains

Practices

Host Units

Supporting Organizations

Enclaves

➡️ This is adirect reference to sufficiency, which evaluates whether thebreadth and depthof evidence is enough to make an informed judgment that the control is truly implemented across theentire assessed environment.

A. Adequacy✘ Adequacy refers to therelevanceof the evidence to the specific practice — not itscoverageacross scope.

B. Capability✘ Not a term used in evidence validation within CMMC CAP documentation.

D. Objectivity✘ While objectivity is important, it refers to theunbiased nature of assessment activities, not to theextent of evidence coverage.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

When an assessor evaluates whether the evidence is broad enough across all necessary systems, units, and enclaves to score a practice as MET, they are evaluatingsufficiency— one of the two core criteria for evidence validity in a CMMC assessment.

Who Verifies the Adequacy and Sufficiency of Evidence?In the CMMC assessment process, it is theAssessment Teamthat is responsible for verifying whether thepractices and related componentshave been met for each in-scopeHost Unit, Supporting Organization/Unit, or enclave.

TheCMMC Assessment Teamis composed of certified assessors and led by aCertified CMMC Assessor (CCA). Their primary role is to:

Review evidenceprovided by theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC).

Determine compliancewith required CMMC practices and processes.

Evaluate the sufficiencyof evidence to confirm that all required practices have been properly implemented.

Document and report findingsto the CMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB).

Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. OSC (Organization Seeking Certification)

The OSC provides documentation and evidence but doesnotverify its adequacy.

❌Incorrect

B. Assessment Team

✅Responsible for verifying the adequacy and sufficiency of evidence.

✅Correct

C. Authorizing Official

Typically refers to an official responsible for system accreditation underNIST RMF, not CMMC.

❌Incorrect

D. Assessment Official

Not a defined role in the CMMC framework.

❌Incorrect

TheCMMC Assessment Process Guide(CAP) outlines theAssessment Team'sresponsibility in verifying evidence.

TheCMMC Assessment Teamevaluates whether theorganization's cybersecurity practices meet CMMC requirements.

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isB. Assessment Team, as per CMMC 2.0 documentation and official assessment processes.