APSE CESP Dumps

The best advocacy for Carl to receive bus training is to assist him to meet with his team and his parents to discuss city bus training, then plan and prepare for the city bus training. This option respects Carl’s right to self-determination and empowerment, as well as his parents’ concerns and involvement. It also allows for a collaborative and individualized approach to address Carl’s transportation needs and goals. The other options are either disrespectful, dishonest, or ineffective in promoting Carl’s independence and inclusion in the generalworkforce. References: https://cesp.helpscoutdocs.com/article/637-cesp-examination-content-outline

https://apse.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CESP-Practice-Exam-8-2.pdf

 Supported employment services are a personalized model for supporting people with significant disabilities to secure and retain paid employment in integrated communitysettings12. The model uses a partnership strategy to enable people with disabilities to achieve sustainable long-term employment and businesses to employ valuable workers12. Supported employment services are based on the core values and principles of inclusion, empowerment, choice, respect, dignity, and individualization12.

Among the four options, only C is consistent with these values and principles, and the most appropriate way to proceed with the individual. By meeting with him to discuss his employment interests, and engaging him in the job development process, the supported employment professional can demonstrate respect for his preferences, goals, and abilities, and empower him to take an active role in his own employment journey12. This can also help to build rapport, trust, and motivation, and address anybarriers or challenges that may have affected his previous engagement and follow through34.

Option A is not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not ready for services, and needs to undergo a prevocational program to assess his skills and abilities. This goes against the supported employment principle of zero exclusion, which states that anyone who wants to work can work, regardless of their level of disability or support needs12. Prevocational programs are often segregated, time-limited, and do not lead to competitive employment outcomes56. Option B is also not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not committed or responsible, and needs to prove himself before receiving services. This goes against the supported employment principle of empowerment, which states that the individual should be treated as an equal partner, and not as a passive recipient of services12. Setting up conditions may also create a power imbalance, and discourage the individual from engaging in the process78. Option D is also not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not welcome or valued by the current program or provider, and needs to start over with a new one. This goes against the supported employment principle of inclusion, which states that theindividual should be supported to participate fully in the community, and not be isolated or excluded12. Referring him to another program or provider may also disrupt the continuity of services, and affect the quality of the relationship and the outcomes910.

References:

• 1: What Is Supported Employment? | British Association for Supported Employment
• 2: Certified Employment Support Professional - apse.org
• 3: Supported Employment Services | DSHS
• 4: What Is Supported Employment? - Integrity, Inc.
• 5: The Case Against Prevocational Services - ThinkWork
• 6: Prevocational Services: A Review of the Literature - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
• 7: Motivational Interviewing in Supported Employment - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
• 8: Motivational Interviewing in Employment Services - Journal of Rehabilitation
• 9: The Importance of Continuity in Employment Services - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
• 10: The Impact of Staff Turnover on Employment Services - Journal of Rehabilitation Administration

Employment First is a national systems-change framework centered on the premise that all individuals, including those individuals with the most significant disabilities, are capable of full participation in Competitive Integrated Employment (CIE) and community life1. Under this approach, publicly-financed systems are urged to align policies, regulatory guidance, andreimbursement structures to commit to CIE as the priority option with respect to the use of publicly-financed day and employment services for youth and adults with significant disabilities1. Many states have formally committed to the Employment First framework through official executive proclamation or formal legislative action1. Employment First is also one of the core values and principles of APSE, the Association of People Supporting Employment First2. References: 1: Employment First | U.S. Department of Labor 2: About APSE - APSE