FCSS_EFW_AD-7.6 Sample Questions Answers

The Fortinet FGSP (FortiGate Session Life Support Protocol) cluster allows session synchronization between two FortiGate devices to provide seamless failover. However, ICMP (ping) is a connectionless protocol, and by default, FortiGate does not synchronize connectionless sessions unless explicitly enabled.

In the exhibit:

● The command get system session list | grep icmp on FortiGate_B returns no output, meaning that ICMP sessions are not being synchronized from FortiGate_A.

● If session-pickup-connectionless is disabled, FortiGate_B will not receive ICMP sessions, causing packet loss during failover.

From the exhibit, ISFW is part of a Security Fabric environment with NGFW-1 as the Fabric Root. In this architecture, FortiGate devices share security intelligence, including logs and detected threats.

ISFW is in a Security Fabric environment:

● Security Fabric allows devices like ISFW to receive threat intelligence from NGFW-1, even if UTM is not enabled locally.

● If NGFW-1 detects malware from IP 10.1.10.1 to 89.238.73.97, this information can be propagated to ISFW and FortiAnalyzer.

The firewall policy in NGFW-1 has UTM enabled:

● Even though ISFW does not have UTM enabled, NGFW-1 (which sits between ISFW and the external network) does have UTM enabled and is scanning traffic.

● Since NGFW-1 detects malware in the session, it logs the event, which is then sent to FortiAnalyzer.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 200 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of Enterprise Firewall 7.6 Administrator documents:

According to the FortiOS 7.6 Administration Guide and the FortiGate Infrastructure study materials, inter-VDOM communication can be achieved using either software-based VDOM links or hardware-accelerated NPU VDOM links (vlinks).

While standard VDOM links (Option B) allow traffic to pass between VDOMs, they are processed by the system CPU, which can become a bottleneck in high-throughput environments. To ensure accelerated internet access as specified in the requirements, NPU vlinks (Option C) must be used. NPU vlinks are virtual interfaces created in pairs that allow traffic to be offloaded to the FortiGate’s Network Processor (NP6, NP7, etc.), significantly reducing latency and CPU overhead.

In the provided exhibit, the root VDOM has direct internet access, while VDOM1 and VDOMn do not. By configuring NPU vlinks between the non-root VDOMs and the root VDOM, you create a hardware-accelerated path. Traffic from the internal VDOMs is sent through the vlink to the root VDOM, which then forwards it to the Internet. This "hub-and-spoke" VDOM architecture, powered by NPU acceleration, ensures that all VDOMs share the internet connection without sacrificing performance.

FortiGate_A and FortiGate_B are in the same autonomous system (AS), and FortiGate_A does not currently have route 172.16.1.248/30 in its routing table. However, FortiGate_B has this route as a connected route.

To dynamically advertise only 172.16.1.248/30 from FortiGate_B to FortiGate_A, the administrator must configure a BGP route map out on FortiGate_B that specifically permits only this prefix.

A BGP route map out on FortiGate_B controls which routes FortiGate_B advertises to FortiGate_A. If no filtering is applied, FortiGate_B might advertise all BGP-learned and connected routes, which is not what the administrator wants. The route map should include a prefix-list that explicitly allows only 172.16.1.248/30 and denies everything else.

IKEv2 (Internet Key Exchange version 2) is an improvement over IKEv1, offering enhanced security, efficiency, and flexibility in VPN configurations.

It includes stronger Diffie-Hellman (DH) groups, such as Elliptic Curve (ECP) groups.

IKEv2 supports stronger cryptographic algorithms, including Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) groups such as ECP256 and ECP384, providing improved security compared to IKEv1.

It supports the extensible authentication protocol (EAP).

IKEv2 natively supports EAP authentication, which allows integration with external authentication mechanisms such as RADIUS, certificates, and smart cards. This is particularly useful for remote access VPNs where user authentication must be flexible and secure.

The OSPF database optimization is necessary to reduce unnecessary routing information and improve network performance. In the given topology, Area 0.0.0.1 is a non-backbone area connected to Area 0.0.0.0 (the backbone area) through an Area Border Router (ABR).

To optimize OSPF in this scenario, configuring Area 0.0.0.1 as a Stub Area will:

● Reduce the size of the OSPF database by preventing external routes (from outside OSPF) from being injected into Area 0.0.0.1.

● Allow only intra-area and inter-area routes, meaning routers in Area 0.0.0.1 will rely on a default route for external destinations.

● Improve convergence time and reduce router processing load since fewer LSAs (Link-State Advertisements) are exchanged.

The set tcp-mss-sender and set tcp-mss-receiver commands in a firewall policy allow an administrator to adjust the Maximum Segment Size (MSS) of TCP packets.

This setting controls the largest payload size that a device can handle in a single TCP segment, ensuring that packets do not exceed the allowed MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) along the network path.

● set tcp-mss-sender adjusts the MSS value for outgoing TCP traffic.

● set tcp-mss-receiver adjusts the MSS value for incoming TCP traffic.

This helps prevent issues with fragmentation and MTU mismatches, improving network performance and avoiding retransmissions.

FortiGate devices with NP6 (Network Processor 6) acceleration offload traffic directly to hardware, bypassing the CPU for improved performance. When auto-asic-offload is enabled in a firewall policy, most of the traffic does not reach the CPU, which means it won't be captured by the standard sniffer trace command.

Since NP6-accelerated traffic is handled entirely in hardware, only a small portion of initial packets (such as session setup packets or exceptions) might be seen in the sniffer output. To capture all packets, the administrator must disable hardware offloading using:

config firewall policy

edit

set auto-asic-offload disable

end

Disabling ASIC offload forces traffic to be processed by the CPU, allowing the sniffer tool to capture all packets.

From the OSPF status output, the key information is:

● "This router is an ASBR" → This means the FortiGate is acting as an Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR).

● An ASBR is responsible for injecting external routing information into OSPF from another routing protocol (such as BGP, static routes, or connected networks).

In FortiManager, pre-run CLI templates are used in Zero-Touch Provisioning (ZTP) and Low-Touch Provisioning (LTP) to configure a FortiGate device before it is fully managed by FortiManager.

These templates apply configurations when a device is initially provisioned. Once the pre-run CLI template is executed, FortiManager automatically unassigns it from the device because it is not meant to persist like other policy configurations. This prevents conflicts and ensures that the FortiGate configuration is not repeatedly applied after the initial setup.

In a hub-and-spoke topology using OSPF over IPsec VPNs, the point-to-multipoint network type is necessary to establish neighbor adjacencies between the hub and spokes. This network type ensures that OSPF operates correctly without requiring a designated router (DR) and allows dynamic routing updates across the IPsec tunnels.

From the BGP neighbor status output, the key issue is that BGP is stuck in the "Idle" state, meaning the FortiGate is unable to establish a BGP session with its peer 100.65.4.1 (Remote AS 65300).

The output also shows:

● "Not directly connected EBGP" → This means the BGP peer is not on the same subnet, requiring multihop BGP.

● "Update source is Loopback" → Since a loopback interface is used, FortiGate must be configured to allow BGP neighbors over multiple hops.

To resolve this issue, the administrator must enable ebgp-enforce-multihop, which allows BGP sessions to be established even when the neighbors are not directly connected.

The diagram shows a FortiGate connected to two FortiSwitches, which suggests the use of FortiLink, Fortinet's protocol for managing switches directly from a FortiGate. Since multiple connections are being used, the LAN interface must be set to 802.3ad (LAG) mode to aggregate the links for redundancy and load balancing.

This setup allows FortiGate to handle VLAN assignments dynamically, as seen with VLAN 10 (192.168.15.1/24). FortiLink ensures seamless integration between FortiGate and FortiSwitches, making STP unnecessary because Fortinet's MCLAG prevents loops at Layer 2. SD-WAN, on the other hand, is used for WAN interfaces and does not apply to switch connectivity in this scenario.

The Internet Service Database (ISDB) in FortiGate is used to enforce content filtering at Layer 3 (Network Layer) and Layer 4 (Transport Layer) of the OSI model by identifying applications based on their predefined IP addresses and ports.

FortiGate has a predefined list of all IPs and ports for specific applications downloaded from FortiGuard:

● FortiGate retrieves and updates a predefined list of IPs and ports for different internet services from FortiGuard.

● This allows FortiGate to block specific services at Layer 3 and Layer 4 without requiring deep packet inspection.

The ISDB blocks the IP addresses and ports of an application predefined by FortiGuard:

● ISDB works by matching traffic to known IP addresses and ports of categorized services.

● When an application or service is blocked, FortiGate prevents communication by denying traffic based on its destination IP and port number.

When designing an ADVPN (Auto-Discovery VPN) network for a large enterprise with spokes that have varying numbers of internet links, the main challenge is to minimize the number of peer connections and routes at the hub while maintaining scalability and efficiency.

Using a dynamic routing protocol (such as BGP or OSPF) with loopback interfaces helps in several ways:

● Reduces the number of peer connections at the hub by using a single loopback address per spoke instead of individual physical interfaces.

● Enables simplified route advertisement by dynamically learning and propagating routes instead of manually configuring static routes.

● Supports multiple internet links per spoke efficiently, as dynamic routing can automatically adjust to the best available path.

● Allows seamless failover if a spoke’s internet link fails, ensuring continuous connectivity.

The exhibit shows an active-passive HA (high availability) cluster with two virtual clusters, where FortiGate_A is the primary device for both Core1 and Core2. If the goal is to have FortiGate_B take over Core2 traffic, its priority must be higher than FortiGate_A for Virtual Cluster 2.

Currently, FortiGate_A has a priority of 150 for Core2, while FortiGate_B has 128. Increasing FortiGate_B’s priority to 200 ensures it becomes the primary for Virtual Cluster 2, taking over the Core2 VDOM traffic while keeping Core1 traffic on FortiGate_A.

Disabling override would prevent forced failovers but wouldn’t change the role distribution. Adjusting the load-balancing method is irrelevant in an active-passive setup, as it only applies to active-active configurations.