CDFOM Sample Questions Answers

Having the correct spare parts strategy is critical for minimizing downtime, especially for mechanical systems such as chillers, CRAC units, pumps, AHUs, and cooling distribution systems. Within the EPI Facilities Management framework, downtime risk and spare parts strategy are tightly linked. When the probability of component failure is high, or uptime requirements are extremely stringent, the recommended approach is to maintainfull spare parts onsite. This ensures rapid replacement of any failed component without waiting for vendor delivery, logistics, or procurement delays.

Afull parts at sitestrategy means that all critical consumable and non-consumable parts—motors, sensors, belts, bearings, filters, control boards, valves, and other essential components—are immediately available. This is the approach used in high-availability data centers targeting Tier III or Tier IV performance levels or facilities operating with strict SLA commitments.

Options A and B increase repair time because missing parts cause extended outages waiting for shipment or vendor arrival. Option D is ineffective because lower-cost parts often fail more frequently, making only high-cost inventory insufficient.

Thus, the safest, lowest-downtime option isfull parts at site.

Aresource matrixin EPI’s organizational framework identifies the resources required to deliver services and match them with the competencies of available staff. The primary considerations when creating a resource matrix are:

Capacity

How many personnel are needed?

Are there enough staff per shift?

Do staffing levels match service requirements, SLAs, and workload?

Capability

Do staff have the required skills and competencies?

Do they meet certification, technical, and operational requirements?

Are backup roles available?

Are personnel trained and fit for assigned tasks?

EPI emphasizes that resource planning must alignskills + quantityto ensure operational continuity.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Cost efficiency is secondary, and availability alone does not ensure capability.

C: Age and gender are irrelevant and inappropriate staffing considerations.

D: Personal preferences do not determine resource allocation.

Thus,capacity and capabilityare the correct considerations.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Resource matrices map staff capacity and capability to service requirements.

Ensures adequate coverage and competency for operations.

In an RFP evaluation matrix,weight factorsare applied to highlight therelative importanceof each evaluation criterion.

Examples of weighted criteria include:

Technical compliance

Response time

Cost

Vendor capability

Warranty terms

SLA performance

The weight factor ensures that more critical criteria influence the final score more heavily, enabling an objective and structured vendor selection.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Weighting does not control prices.

C: Negotiation comes after scoring.

D: Workforce size is not the purpose of weighting.

Thus,Bis correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Weighted scoring ensures high-priority criteria significantly influence vendor selection.

Supports objective and transparent procurement.

While not strictly internal to EPI’s core domain (which deals with data centre operations), this question refers to the external risk landscape, as identified by the World Economic Forum (WEF). The WEF’sGlobal Risks Report 2025shows thatenvironmental risks dominate the 10-year horizon, with extreme weather, ecosystem collapse, and climate-related disruption ranking highest.

Specifically,global climate change(or extreme weather/climate-related events) is rated as the most severe risk over the next decade. While water scarcity and air quality are significant, the WEF ranks climate change / extreme weather as the top long-term threat. Therefore, optionAis the most correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Environmental sustainability forms a major component of data centre operations risk and resilience planning.

External macro-risks such as climate change must be integrated into facility resilience, power planning, cooling design, and business continuity strategies.

Qualitative risk analysis is the process of assessing risks usingdescriptive,non-numerical, andcategoricalscales to evaluate:

Probability (likelihood)

Impact (severity)

It often uses terms like:

Low / Medium / High

Minor / Moderate / Severe

Likely / Unlikely

This analysis supports prioritization, but the definition itself is aboutdescribing impact and probability, not financial quantification.

Why other options are incorrect:

Adescribes quantitative risk analysis (monetary values).

Bis incomplete; qualitative analysis assesses both impact AND likelihood.

Dis an outcome of qualitative analysis, not the definition.

Thus,Cis the correct answer.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Qualitative analysis assesses likelihood and impact using descriptive scales.

Used when monetary or statistical values are not required.

Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) is the most widely recognized and adopted energy efficiency indicator for data centers globally and is emphasized heavily within the EPI sustainability framework. PUE measures how effectively a data center uses power and is calculated by dividing theTotal Facility Powerby theIT Equipment Power. The purpose of this indicator is to show how much of the energy consumed by the facility actually reaches IT equipment (servers, storage, network gear) versus how much is consumed by support infrastructure such as cooling, UPS losses, lighting, and building systems.

A lower PUE indicates a more efficient data center, with values approaching 1.0 representing ideal efficiency—where nearly all consumed power is being used for IT load. PUE is essential for benchmarking, energy-saving initiatives, identifying efficiency improvement opportunities, and measuring the success of infrastructure optimization projects. The other options listed—nil, w; CPU; and uw—are irrelevant to facility energy efficiency metrics. CPU relates to computing processors, not facility efficiency; the others are incorrect units or meaningless terms in this context.

Thus,PUEis the correct and industry-standard power efficiency indicator.

In the context of defining services (after needs analysis) in the EPI framework, a good service definition should beSMART— Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound. This ensures that the service can be consistently delivered, measured, controlled, and improved.

Specific: clearly defined service features and scope

Measurable: metrics and KPIs are defined

Achievable: realistic given resources and capabilities

Relevant: aligns with business/customer needs

Time-bound: has defined timelines for delivery and review

While following PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) (option A) is good practice for continuous improvement, it is not what characterises aservice definition. Meeting ROI (option C) is business-case oriented, not a service definition criterion. Having an underlying SLA (option D) is related but not the core characteristic of a well-defined service itself.

Thus, the correct answer isB.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Service definitions should be clear, measurable, and aligned with business/customer needs.

A SMART definition supports service design, delivery, monitoring, and improvement.

EPI guidelines on asset management state that assets should betagged and entered into the asset management database as early as possible, specifically:

At the moment of unpacking.

Reasons:

Prevents loss or misplacement

Ensures traceability during staging, testing, and installation

Supports lifecycle tracking from the earliest stage

Ensures accurate configuration and inventory management

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Contract activation is unrelated to labeling.

C: Testing occurs after unpacking; labeling must precede it.

D: Commissioning is too late; the asset must already be tracked.

Thus,Bis correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Asset labeling begins as soon as equipment is unpacked.

Early tagging ensures full lifecycle traceability and compliance.

Succession planning ensures organizational continuity by preparing internal staff to step into key roles when needed.

EPI’s organizational management framework emphasizes:

Structured Skill GrowthA Career Development Program provides:

targeted training

competency building

job rotation

professional certification pathways

mentorship and development planning

Identification of Future LeadersThrough career development planning, individuals are tracked, evaluated, and groomed for future responsibilities.

Internal Capability StrengtheningSuccession planning focuses on internal development first, before external hiring options.

Why the other options are not correct:

B. Disciplinary programUsed for performance or behavioral issues; it does not contribute to succession planning.

C. Relationship with managerWhile helpful, it is not a formal tool for succession planning and is not an EPI-recognized structural process.

D. External recruitmentThis is a remedy when internal succession strength is insufficient—not a tool for optimizing succession planning.

Thus,A — Career development programis the correct choice.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts

Succession planning depends on structured skill development.

Training, assessment, and career development form the foundation of succession pipelines.

Job rotation and development programs are integral to organizational continuity.

For environmental management systems (EMS), the internationally recognized and adopted standard is:

ISO 14001 — Environmental Management Systems

ISO 14001 provides a framework for:

Environmental policy

Environmental impact assessment

Sustainability objectives

Compliance obligations

Environmental performance monitoring

Continuous improvement

Why the other options are incorrect:

A – EU-COC: Energy efficiency best practices for data centers, not a full EMS.

B – ISO 50001: Energy management standard, focusing on energy efficiency only.

C – LEED: Building sustainability certification, not a management system.

Thus,Dis correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

ISO 14001 is the recognized standard for environmental management systems.

Supports sustainability, compliance, and environmental performance improvement.

Under EPI’s safety and statutory requirements, all electrical portable equipment must:

Be routinelytested and tagged

Show proof of the last inspection

Be kept in safe working condition

Be removed from service immediately if found unsafe

Loose electrical cabling and missing testing history indicate unsafe equipment.

Equipment that fails visual inspection or lacks test records must be labeled “out of service” and sent for formal inspection/testing.

WhyCis correct:

It follows the required "testing & tagging" compliance process.

It prevents the use of unsafe equipment.

It aligns with EPI’s requirement to isolate defective equipment until verified safe.

It ensures proper record-keeping and re-certification.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Urgency does not override safety regulations.

B: Using duct tape is unsafe and violates electrical safety standards.

D: Disposal is not required unless testing confirms the item is beyond repair.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Unsafe or untested electrical equipment must be removed from service.

Testing & tagging is mandatory.

Safety takes precedence over urgency.

EPI defines several facility options for Business Continuity:

Company-owned facility→ highest cost

Co-location→ moderate to high cost

Government-owned facility→ typically not a commercially viable or general-purpose BC option

Disaster Recovery (DR) provider→lowest-costsolution for BC

ADR provideroffers:

Shared or subscription-based DR facilities

Lower capital investment

Pay-as-you-use or retainer-based access

Rapid availability without owning infrastructure

Minimal financial burden for standby capacity

This aligns with management’s goal:cheapest possible alternative facility.

Thus,D – DR provideris correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

DR provider facilities are the most economical BC facility option.

They provide shared resources and reduce capital expenditure.

Stakeholder involvement must beginat the very start of the project lifecycle, during theInitiation Phase, because:

Stakeholders influence project scope, objectives, and constraints.

Their expectations and requirements must be captured early.

Stakeholder identification is a mandatory output of the initiation process.

Failing to involve them early leads to misalignment, rework, and scope conflicts.

EPI aligns with general project management principles that state:

“Stakeholder identification and engagement begins at project initiation and continues throughout the entire project.”

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Planning depends on stakeholder input already gathered.

C: Too late—execution requires validated stakeholder requirements.

D: Monitoring occurs after execution has begun.

Thus,Ais correct.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Stakeholders must be identified and engaged in the initiation phase.

Their input forms the foundation for scope definition and planning.

In the EPI framework for risk management, after the risk identification and risk analysis steps, therisk evaluationstep determines whether the assessed risks areacceptableorrequire treatmentbased on the organization’s risk appetite, criteria, and the potential impact. The evaluation leads to a decision on whether risk treatment needs to take place.

It isnotsimply compiling all risks (so option C is incorrect).

It isnotexclusively about budgeting (so option D is incorrect) though budgeting follows treatment decisions.

It isnotnecessarily advising to accept all risks (so option B is incorrect) but rather it supports decision-making on treatment.

Therefore, option A is correct: the outcome is the decision whether to treat the risk.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts

Risk evaluation assesses identified and analysed risks against risk criteria to decide on acceptability or need for treatment.

The outcome is a documented decision-making step in the risk management process.

EPI’s physical security framework requiresmandatory background screeningforallindividuals assigned to security roles, regardless of:

previous experience

certifications

law enforcement background

length of employment

Security personnel have privileged access to sensitive areas and are responsible for enforcing access control, incident response, and compliance. Therefore:

No exemptionsare permitted.

Prior experience or certification doesnotreplace a formal background check.

Even previous law enforcement staff must undergo screening.

Thus, the correct answer isC.

EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)

Background screening is mandatory for all security personnel.

No exceptions are permitted, regardless of experience or qualifications.