IIC C11 Dumps

PIPEDAis the federal Canadian privacy legislation governing how private-sector organizations—including insurance companies, brokers, and adjusters—collect, use, and disclosepersonal informationduring commercial activities. Its full and correct name is:

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act

PIPEDA sets out requirements for informed consent, accuracy, safeguarding of data, client access rights, and limitations on secondary use of personal information. Insurance operations rely heavily on personal data, so compliance is mandatory.

Options A, B, and C are fictitious and have no connection to Canadian insurance regulation or privacy law.

Thus, the correct answer isD.

In insurance terminology, aspeculative riskis a situation where there is a possibility of either financial gain or financial loss, depending on how events unfold. This is what makes it different from apure risk, where the only possible outcomes are loss or no loss (but never a profit). Examples of speculative risk include investing in the stock market, starting a business, or buying foreign currency. In each of these situations, you may end up with a profit, break even, or suffer a loss.

Because speculative risks involve the potential for profit, they are generally not insurable. Insurance is designed to respond to pure risks, such as the risk of fire damaging a building, or a car accident causing injury or property damage. In those cases, there is no opportunity for financial gain from the event itself—only the chance of economic loss or no loss at all.

Therefore, the defining characteristic of speculative risk, and the correct answer to this question, is the possibility of either gain or loss, which is captured by option D.

Under contract law principles referenced inPrinciples and Practice of Insurance, a contract is only valid when both parties givefree, informed, and genuine consent. Fraud occurs when one party intentionally misleads another through deception, false representation, or concealment to induce consent. In this scenario, John intentionally misrepresented the nature of the accommodation—promising his private residence while intending to place Louise in a different, inferior property.

Because Louise agreed based on amaterial misrepresentation, the contract is voidable due tofraud, meaning she can invoke nullity and have the contract deemed without effect. Fraud differs from error in that the misinformation wasdeliberatelycreated by John. It is not lesion (which relates to unfair disadvantage in value) nor violence (which involves physical or psychological coercion). Therefore, the correct answer isB. Fraud.