3V0-24.25 Sample Questions Answers

VCF 9.0 explicitly documents thatVKS supports two CNI options: Antrea and Calico, and that thesystem-defined default CNI is Antrea. This directly eliminates Flannel and Cilium as default supported options for VKS clusters on Supervisor in this context. VCF 9.0 also describes how a vSphere administrator can view or change this setting in the vSphere Client underSupervisor Management → Configure → Kubernetes Service → Default CNI, further reinforcing that Antrea is the baseline/default choice.

From a policy perspective in the question, the requirement is Kubernetes-layer observability and control of pod communications “without additional licensing or overlay complexity.” Antrea is presented in VCF 9.0 as the default CNI and is implemented usingOpen vSwitch, with networking and network policy capabilities provided at the Kubernetes layer for pods and services. Because it is the documented default (and supported) option for new VKS clusters, selectingAntreabest aligns with the “default supported option” requirement.

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 documents a dedicated backup-and-restore approach forWorkload Managementwhere different components use different tools. Forworkloadsrunning on vSphere Supervisor–based Kubernetes (bothvSphere PodsandVKS cluster workloads), the documented solution isVelero, specifically theVelero Plugin for vSphereinstalled and configured on the Supervisor. The “Considerations for Backing Up and Restoring Workload Management” table explicitly lists: “Backup and restore vSphere Pods — Velero Plugin for vSphere” and “Backup stateless and stateful workloads on a VKS cluster and restore to a cluster provisioned by VKS — Velero Plugin for vSphere.”

The same section also clarifies thatSupervisor backups(via vCenter file-based backup) are for restoring theSupervisor control plane/stateand VKS node VMs—not for restoring workloads themselves—so workloads must be backed up separately.

Therefore, the correct tool for backing up and restoring workloads on clusters provisioned by vSphere Supervisor isVelero (using the Velero Plugin for vSphere).

VCF 9.0 explicitly lists thecomponents that run in a VKS clusterand groups them into areas such as authentication/authorization, storage integration, pod networking, and load balancing. In that list, the documentation names:“Container Storage Interface Plugin”(a paravirtual CSI plug-in that integrates with CNS through the Supervisor),“Container Network Interface Plug-in”(a CNI plugin that provides pod networking), and“Cloud Provider Implementation”(supports creating Kubernetes load balancer services).

These three items map directly to the answer choicesD (Container Storage Interface),F (Container Network Interface), andA (Cloud Provider Implementation). The same VCF 9.0 section also mentions an authentication webhook, but that component is not offered as a selectable option in this question, so the best three matches among the provided choices are the CSI, CNI, and cloud provider implementation entries that the document explicitly states are present inside a VKS cluster.

Harbor is used as aprivate registry serviceto store and distribute container artifacts for Kubernetes consumption, which is exactly what’s needed for a multi-tenant platform where multiple teams require isolated repositories. The VMware documentation treats Harbor as aVMware Tanzu Harbor Registry service, including governance around who can operate it and how teams are separated intoprojects(a key multi-tenancy boundary). For example, vSphere privileges explicitly cover the ability tocreate or delete a Harbor registryand tocreate, delete, or purge Harbor registry projects, reinforcing that Harbor is operated as a managed registry with project-scoped administration and access control.

In practice for regulated environments, the registry role is not just storage—Harbor is commonly used to enforce enterprise controls likepolicy-driven access (RBAC), and it supports security capabilities such asimage vulnerability scanningandimage trust/signing, which directly address the requirement to prevent unsafe images from being promoted or deployed.

VCF 9.0 describesCloud Native Storage (CNS) on vCenteras the component that implements “provisioning and lifecycle operations for persistent volumes.” When provisioning persistent volumes, CNS “interacts with the vSphere First Class Disk functionality to create virtual disks that back the volumes,” and it “communicates with Storage Policy Based Management to guarantee a required level of service to the disks.” This is exactly the storage-policy-to-backed-virtual-disk relationship the question is testing: storage policies (via policy-based management) define requirements, and CNS is the vCenter-side service that applies those requirements while creating and managing the backing storage objects.

In contrast,CSI(including Supervisor CNS-CSI and VKS pvCSI) is the Kubernetes-facing interface/driver used to request and consume storage, but it does not “provide” the vSphere storage policy system; rather, it relies on CNS/CNS-CSI and vCenter services to fulfill provisioning requests. Therefore,vSphere Cloud Native Storage (CNS)is the correct choice.

In VCF 9.0, cluster autoscaling is delivered as anoptionalcapability that requires installing theCluster Autoscaleras a standard package. The VCF 9.0 materials explicitly call out Cluster Autoscaler as an optionally installed package for vSphere Kubernetes Service, alongside other optional packages (for example, Harbor, Velero, Istio, etc.). The release information further emphasizes that autoscaling features (including newer behaviors such as scaling from/to zero for supported VKr versions) require that “the autoscaler standard package” be installed.

Operationally, installing the autoscaler package provides the controller that watches pending pods and node utilization signals and then drives the required changes in desired worker capacity. After that controller is present, you typically express scaling intent through the cluster’s declarative configuration (for example, worker pool/node pool constraints and limits) so the autoscaler can act within the boundaries you define. Without the autoscaler package, changing replica counts or expecting automatic node growth/shrink will not produce autoscaling behavior because the control loop that performs those actions is missing.

Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is implemented through theRBAC API group(rbac.authorization.k8s.io) and defines the core authorization primitives used to grant permissions to users, groups, and service accounts. The cluster-scoped objects declared by the RBAC API areClusterRoleandClusterRoleBinding. AClusterRoledefines a set of permissions (verbs such as get/list/watch/create/update/delete) over resources at thecluster scope(including cluster-wide resources and optionally namespaced resources across namespaces). AClusterRoleBindingthenbindsthat ClusterRole to a subject (user/group/serviceaccount), making those permissions effective cluster-wide.

This differs from namespace-scoped RBAC objects (RoleandRoleBinding) which apply only within a single namespace. The other options are incorrect becauseClusterObject/ClusterNodeare not RBAC API objects,ValidatingAdmissionPolicybelongs to the admission control API surface (policy enforcement),ResourceQuotais a namespace resource governance object, andContainer/Deploymentare workload/runtime concepts defined in the core/apps APIs rather than authorization primitives.

In VCF 9.0, ingress is described as part ofVKS cluster networking. The documentation’s VKS Cluster Networking table lists“Cluster ingress”and identifies its role asrouting inbound pod traffic. It further clarifies that this function is delivered by athird-party ingress controller, and explicitly namesContouras an example (“you can use any third-party ingress controller, such as Contour”).

That mapping is exactly what optionAdescribes: Contour is deployed to provideingresscapabilities so that inbound requests from outside the cluster can be routed to Kubernetes services and pods according to ingress rules. In other words, Contour is not a storage component (that would align to CSI/CNS/pvCSI), not a node lifecycle manager (that is handled by VKS/Cluster API/VM Service), and not an infrastructure health monitoring tool (that would be metrics/observability tooling). VCF 9.0 positions Contour specifically within theingresspart of the networking feature set, makingAthe correct answer.

VCF 9.0 documentation explicitly indicates thatvCenter upgrades and the Supervisor/cluster (Workload Management) upgrade are distinct, noting that “if you have only upgraded vCenter and not the cluster” then DevOps engineers have reduced permissions until the cluster is upgraded. This supports the stated standard that VKS/Workload Management lifecycle can be treated separately from vCenter. For the private registry requirement, VCF 9.0 provides an operational mechanism to authenticate and pull artifacts from private registries: “Registry secrets allow package and repository consumers to authenticate to and pull images from private registries,” implemented via a standard Kubernetes Secret of type kubernetes.io/dockerconfigjson.

Taken together, the standard implies (1)asynchronoushandling (separate lifecycle from vCenter) and (2)privatesourcing (images pulled from an internal registry with registry secrets). Therefore, selectingAsynchronous Privatebest matches both requirements in a single configuration choice, aligning with the documented separation of upgrades and the documented need to use authenticated access to private registries.

VCF 9.0 describes a standardized approach to deploying optional capabilities on VKS clusters viastandard packages. In the VCF Automation cloud services overview, VMware listsIstioamong the packages that “can be optionally installed” for VKS. For installing those packages, the VCF CLI provides a dedicatedpackage pluginthat “works on a workload cluster” and exposes explicitinstallworkflows.

The VCF CLI command reference shows the syntax for installing a package:

vcf package install INSTALLED_PACKAGE_NAME --package PACKAGE_NAME --version VERSION (with optional values files and overlays). This is the supported, VCF-aligned way to install standard packages such as Istio onto a VKS workload cluster in a controlled, declarative manner, including tracking reconciliation status and providing configuration via a values file.

Options that rely on ad-hoc downloads (curl) or building tooling (docker build) do not match the documented VCF package-management workflow for VKS standard packages. Therefore, the correct command family isvcf package install.

In Workload Management, updating the Supervisor and updating VKS clusters are related but distinct lifecycle operations. The Supervisor runs its own Kubernetes distribution, while VKS clusters consume vSphere Kubernetes releases (VKrs). These are “delivered differently,” with Supervisor Kubernetes releases and VKrs each having their own release cadence and compatibility constraints. As a result, successfully updating the Supervisor control plane does not automatically change the Kubernetes version running inside an existing VKS workload cluster; the VKS cluster must be updated to a compatible VKr separately. This mismatch is exactly why an application can still fail after a Supervisor update: the DevOps engineer is still deploying onto a cluster that hasn’t been updated to the Kubernetes version required by the application (or by the API versions/features it depends on). Additionally, Workload Management enforces sequential minor-version updates and compatibility checks between Supervisor and VKrs, so the correct remediation is to update the VKS cluster to an appropriate VKr that satisfies both application needs and Supervisor compatibility.

In VCF 9.0, VKS cluster provisioning and lifecycle management is built around Kubernetes-native, declarative APIs. The VMware documentation describes thatCluster API provides declarative, Kubernetes-style APIs for cluster creation, configuration, and management, and that its inputs include the cluster definition plus the resources describing the virtual machines and “cluster add-ons.” This is why Cluster API is the component associated withprovisioning(creating and managing) workload clusters in the VKS model.

By contrast,cert-manageris typically used to automate certificate issuance/renewal for in-cluster components, andCarvelis a set of tools often used to package, configure, and install Kubernetes software, but neither is the core provisioning controller for creating the clusters themselves. The VCF documentation is explicit that Cluster API is the API layer responsible for cluster creation/configuration/management, making it the correct answer for provisioning VKS workload clusters (including those intended to run service mesh capabilities).

The errors described—specifically the memcache.go failure, the inability to fetch resource lists for Antrea, and the YAML context error—are classic symptoms of aConfiguration Context mismatch. In VCF 9.0, there are two distinct layers of API interaction: theSupervisor Cluster API(used for management tasks like creating clusters) and theGuest Cluster API(used for deploying workloads within the VKS).

When an administrator upgrades a Supervisor, the API endpoint or the available API groups may change. If the administrator attempts to run kubectl commands against a VKS cluster while their kubeconfig context is still pointing to the Supervisor (or vice versa), the client will encounter "mapping values" errors and "unable to handle request" errors because it is sending requests to an endpoint that does not recognize those specific resource definitions (like Antrea stats in the wrong context). To resolve this, the administrator must ensure they have switched to the correct context using kubectl config use-context after the Supervisor update to ensure the local client is communicating with the correct API server and version of the Kubernetes binaries.

Hosts and Clusters

To create avSphere Zone(used as a Supervisor Management Zone and/or Workload Zone), the administrator must start from the vSphere Client inventory wherevCenterand its clusters are managed. That’s why the correct starting point in the “Inventories” toolbar isHosts and Clusters—it is the entry point used to select the vCenter object and the target clusters.

VCF 9.0 documents the zone-creation workflow as:navigate to vCenter, thenSelect Configure, thenselect vSphere Zones, and finally clickAdd New vSphere Zone. After naming the zone, youselect a vSphere cluster to add to the zoneand finish the wizard.

This sequence matches the intent of the hotspot: you must first open the inventory view that exposes vCenter and clusters (Hosts and Clusters), then perform the configuration steps under vCenter to define vSphere Zones. Once created, these zones can later be selected during Supervisor deployment (for multi-zone placement) or assigned to namespaces for workload placement.

VCF 9.0 defines aVCF CLI contextas aconfiguration setfor a specific endpoint (for example, a Kubernetes cluster, vSphere Supervisor, or VCF Automation) and explains that a context stores the key connection parameters such asendpoint,context type,path to kubeconfig, andcredentials. This aligns directly with optionC, because vcf context create is used to create anamedcontext that encapsulates the access parameters needed to work with a specific Supervisor or VKS cluster and to switch between multiple environments without rewriting configuration each time.

The documentation further shows vcf context create being used to connect either to aSupervisor endpointor to aworkload (VKS) cluster(by providing workload cluster name/namespace or by using a generated kubeconfig), which is exactly the multi-tenant operational pattern in the question. While authentication is part of what happens during context creation (for example, creating a configuration that includes a JWT for Kubernetes API access), the command’s purpose is broader: it creates the reusablecontextobject that defineswhereandhowthe CLI connects.